Supreme Court Justice Works Spider-Man Into Law

Elena-Kagan-Associate-Justice-of-United-States-Supreme-Court-U.S.-S.-Ct.U.S. Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagen is evidently a Spider-Fan. The court handed down its decision on a royalty case involving a patent on a Spider-Man toy that shoots silly string. A product inventor wanted wanted Marvel to pay royalties indefinitely but the court sided with Marvel.

In writing the decision Justice Kagan said:

  • “The parties set no end date for royalties, apparently contemplating that they would continue for as 61usYDarDWL._SX300_long as kids want to imitate Spider-Man (by doing whatever a spider can).”
  • “Patents endow their holders with certain superpowers, but only for a limited time.”
  • “To the contrary, the decision’s close relation to a whole web of precedents means that reversing it could threaten others.”
  • “What we can decide, we can undecide. But stare decisis teaches that we should exercise that authority sparingly. Cf. S. Lee and S. Ditko, Amazing Fantasy No. 15: “SpiderMan,” p. 13 (1962) (“[I]n this world, with great power there must also come — great responsibility”).”

So Spider-Man’s greatest message is now on the books. How cool is that?

Here’ a video with the patent holder from a few months ago.

Liked it? Take a second to support the Crawlspace on Patreon!

(4) Comments

  1. Old Guy

    This is so awesome. It really deserves more than three comments. I like Elena Kagen MUCH more than I did last week !

  2. dornwolf

    This some how reminds me of when Ginsburg(?) acknowledged that the supreme court ripped through a bunch of video games in an effort to understand them as they had a case they had to deal with. Now tells kid when they're young if you grow up and become a lawyer all that time reading comics and playing video games actually does eventually pay off.

  3. Stillanerd

    Oh, and here's a little more background on the case, as well:

  4. Stillanerd

    Just in case anyone was curious about how the Supreme Court ruled in the case (Kimble v Marvel), here's a couple of articles about the decision:

Leave a Reply