Thanks to Big Al on our message board for finding these. Evidently in Astonishing Spider-Man #57, which was released in the UK back in 2000, the issue featured a back up story with Peter reacting to the Clone Saga. No writer is attached but Al suspects J.M. DeMatteis wrote it. Check it out, it’s an interesting read.
Brad Douglas
View articlesBrad created the Crawlspace back in 1998 while attending college at the University of Missouri-Columbia. He’s the webmaster and writes front page news items, and also produces, hosts and edits the podcast. He’s been collecting Spider-Man comics since the age of three and is a life-long fan of the webhead. His website has been featured in USA Today, Entertainment Weekly and on Marvel.com and inside the comics themselves. The Crawlspace is one of the first Spider-Man fan sites to ever hit the internet. Millions of people visit the site every year.
Brad has interviewed several “Spider-Celebrities” over the years including co-creator Stan Lee. He’s also interviewed actors who have portrayed Spider-Man like Paul Soles (Voice Actor from the 67 Spider-Man Cartoon), Dan Gilvezan (Spidey Voice Actor from Spider-Man & His Amazing Friends) ,Yuri Lownthal (Voice Actor from the Spider-Man PlayStation game) and Nicholas Hammond (Spider-Man 1977 Actor).
You might be interested in …
Keeping Track of ASM1 Variants
It seems every week there are more and more variants for the first issue of Amazing Spider-Man. Which one will you be getting? The book comes out on April 30th and is $5.99.
Sony Emails: Spidey Should Be A Snapchattin’ Mudder!
Another entry from the Sony Wikileaks treasure trove. A.V. Club’s Sean O’Neal read a tweet by Twitter user ‘Duke,’ who had made an enlightening find on the Sony Wikileaks searchable database. It was an email […]
Sinister Wars #1 FIVE Page Reveal
Marvel.com have given us our first look at 5 pages of Sinister War #1 Doctor Octopus is back… And the Sinister War has begun! Ock’s got a new Sinister Six and if you think he’s […]
13 Comments
Leave a Reply
Crawlspace Discord

Social
Recent Comments
Hornacek on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #23 (Legacy #987): “CARNAGE KNOWS”: “Anne Weying is the name of Eddie’s (deceased) ex-wife. “Anaconda consumes local resident Francine Weylin, 72”. It’s on the page…” Mar 5, 14:41
Evan Berry on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #23 (Legacy #987): “CARNAGE KNOWS”: “@Hornacek — I have a question: I may be missing something, because when I saw that you had written the…” Mar 5, 13:01
ryan3178 on Read’s Reads Amazing Spider-Man/Venom Death Spiral #1 Review: “It’s kind of like the Guardians Lite are mentioned but everything with Hellgate accept for a passing talk in Amazing…” Mar 4, 17:53
Hornacek on Read’s Reads Amazing Spider-Man/Venom Death Spiral #1 Review: “I did laugh at how Hellgate and his planet’s imminent destruction was not mentioned at all. A planet-wide catastrophe, and…” Feb 27, 06:01
Evan Berry on Read’s Reads Amazing Spider-Man/Venom Death Spiral #1 Review: “I guess if Ben’s shenanigans as Peter somehow plays an important part in the resolution of Death Spiral, maybe it’ll…” Feb 26, 08:16
Evan Berry on Panel of the Day #1744 (Splash Page Sunday!): “Wow, twelve issues for $4.00.” Feb 23, 14:54
Evan Berry on Panel(s) of the Day #1745 (Mary Jane Monday!): “Spider-man: Torn would have us believe that Mary Jane and Gwen were the best of friends, but here they despise…” Feb 23, 10:42
Hornacek on Panel of the Day #1744 (Splash Page Sunday!): “LOL at the narration calling Spidey “an idiot”.” Feb 22, 09:04
Dark Mark on MARCO SPEAKS SPIDEY: The Amazing Spider-Man (2026) #22 REVIEW: “This issue reminds me of “It was the best of times, it was the worst of times.” I liked it…” Feb 19, 14:24






@12-Glad to hear it.
@11 – ooohhh… Yeah, I did enjoy it. It’s not everyday we get to really hear Peter’s inner thoughts and feelings.
@#10-I can’t stand Otto. But I was actually asking if you enjoyed the above story in this article lols
@9 I think in the beginning I had a hard time accepting all the change. But I enjoy Spider-Man enough to have kept reading the last six years (wow, I can’t believe it’s been that long). I wasn’t a big fan of Otto being Spidey, but it’s grown on me as well.
@#8-I don’t know bro. I just do not know. Did you enjoy this story at the least?
@7 – exactly, but how can you tell someone to forget the past 20 years? I may as well burn all those issues because they mean nothing. *L*
@#6-Really it’s an entirely different continuty
@5 – I don’t think I’ll ever be able to figure out what did and did not happen in the Spider-Man universe post 1987. As far as I’m concerned, once the marriage became nullified, so did 20 years of Spider-Man. One can’t assume the same events transpired. I think that’s what annoyed me the most about the retcon.
@4-Technically it was OMIT which provided the most evidence that the pregnancy never happened and (along with bringing back Harry) did the impossible by making the Clone Saga retroactively even more confusing than it was at the time. Someone once said that saying the Clone Saga happened but there was no pregnancy is like saying the Master Planner trilogy happened but Aunt May wasn’t sick and that just about sums up the confusion
@3 – I agree as well. With the marriage undone, so was the pregnancy. But up until One More Day I had hoped Baby Parker would resurface.
@#1-In post OMD continuty it seems like she never existed which sucks but before that I totally beleived she was alive somewhere. Hell maybe she still is in 616 continuity
@#2-I only speculated that it might be JMD because with no other information to go on I just looked to the Clone Saga writers and the style of the writing sounded like JMD to me. Plus I have no idea WHO in the UK might have written it. the magazine gave no credit at all
If I had to guess, I’d imagine it was written by a UK-based freelancer rather than any of the US talent.
The lost Parker baby. That still aggravates me to this day. I’m still not convinced baby May actually died. But this is a good recap.
http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2013/02/14/abandoned-love-whatever-happened-to-peter-and-mary-janes-baby/