After getting over a cold, I return to review issues 11-12/605-906 of Amazing Spider-Man. As Spider-Man once again deals with the return of the Hobgoblin, or is it Hobgoblins? Or is it more than just one goblin beyond that? That’s a good question and while I love the artwork and the use of continuity with the story arc. The story is dragged down by the subplots with the supporting cast and Peter trusting, not trusting Norman… again. But hey don’t worry folks, Dark Web will answer our questions in a couple of months.
ryan3178
View articlesBusiness and Technology Teacher, blogger and long time comic book collector.
You might be interested in …
Alford Notes: ASM #31/832 – Absolute Carnage Part 2
by Mark Alford
Folks, if you liked last issue, you are going to like this one. We pick up where we left off and Kindred continues his remembering of day gone by. If you had any doubt of […]
Alford Notes: Amazing Spider-Man 28
by Mark Alford
OK folks! This one has everything you want in an issue (assuming that you want Silver Sable, Countess Karkov, Osborn, the Wildpack, S.H.I.E.L.D., Mockingbird, and… oh yeah, Spider-Man – if not, then you’re out of […]
Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 2) #30 (471) Review
by HB 56
Amazing Spider-Man 30 PLOT: Peter goes out for a night of web-slinging to blow off steam after Mary Jane’s departure. He takes out his frustration on an abandon building, ultimately demolishing it. The next day as […]
Social
Recent Comments
- Hornacek on Panel of the Day #1549 (Splash Page Sunday!): ““Fitzgerald Grapes” That has to be a reference to someone, right?” May 5, 14:46
- Evan Berry on Panel(s) of the Day #1548: “And tomorrow it’ll be the 17th anniversary of the release of Spider-man 3.” May 3, 10:47
- Jeff Walling on The Chi✶Town Breakdown: USM #4 (2024): “I loved the issue – one thing that stuck out to me was how oily MJs hair looked in the…” May 2, 15:42
- Hornacek on The Chi✶Town Breakdown: USM #4 (2024): “@Evan – I went back and saw the “stain”. To me it just looks like a shadow or smudge -…” May 1, 15:58
- Evan Berry on The Chi✶Town Breakdown: USM #4 (2024): “@Chi-Town — It’s probably just a design choice, and I’m thinking too hard. 😀” May 1, 15:55
- Chi-Town Spidey on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #48 (Legacy #942): “The Doctor Will See You Now” or “The (Henry) Winkler Device Returns”: “*checks in* Yep, ASM still sucks…I’m glad Hornacek is covering reviews, otherwise we have to listen to Mark wine.” May 1, 15:04
- Chi-Town Spidey on The Chi✶Town Breakdown: USM #4 (2024): “Hornacek: Who do you think TAUGHT that to Mark? That’s why he calls me his “best friend”. Evan: Honestly, never…” May 1, 15:00
- Hornacek on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #46 (Legacy #940): “The Ravencroft Redemption” or “Anna Watson, Villain Rehabilitator”: “@Evan Berry: A two-parter makes more sense – a 1980s sitcom would not likely have a subplot going on for…” May 1, 13:49
- Hornacek on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #48 (Legacy #942): “The Doctor Will See You Now” or “The (Henry) Winkler Device Returns”: “@Aqu@: “IMO, the ‘behind the scene’ bit was in bad taste; it’s also unnecessary, since actions tell more than words.…” May 1, 13:42
- Aqu@ on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #48 (Legacy #942): “The Doctor Will See You Now” or “The (Henry) Winkler Device Returns”: “IMO, the “behind the scene” bit was in bad taste; it’s also unnecessary, since actions tell more than words. It…” May 1, 11:55