‘Nuff said!
Peter Parker, the Spectacular Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #78
Published: c. February, 1983?
Cover Date: May, 1983
“The Long Goodbye!”
Writer: Bill Mantlo
Artist: Al Milgrom
Inker: Jim Mooney
Letterer: Joe Rosen
Colorist: Bob Sharen
You might be interested in …
Panel(s) of the Day #838
So you’re telling me that Bullseye is just a rip-off of Boomerang? Peter Parker, the Spectacular Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #81 Published: c. May, 1983? Cover Date: August, 1983 “Stalkers in the Shadows” Writer: Bill Mantlo […]
Panel of the Day #1466 (Splash Page Sunday!)
Hey, he said the name of the issue! Web of Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #68 Published: c. July, 1990? Cover Date: September, 1990 “Tombstone Territory” Writer: Gerry Conway Artist: Alex Saviuk Inker: Keith Williams Letterer: Rick […]
Panel(s) of the Day #849
Whoever it is, he’ll be a supporting character for a quite a while. Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #208 Published: c. June, 1980? Cover Date: September, 1980 “Fusion!” Writer: Denny O’Neil Artist: John Romita Jr. Inker: […]
1 Comment
Leave a Reply
Support the Crawlspace on Patreon
Crawlspace Discord
Recent Comments
on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “@Paul Penna: I wouldn’t say I was liking Cormac before the Ravage reveal but his character was … “ok”. I…” Oct 4, 08:59- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “I’m surprised by how much I enjoyed Cormac Crane/Ravage. The story is well written, his powers are interesting and he…” Oct 3, 16:27
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “@Big John: Yeah, an annual is a good comparison. Annuals used to have one big story and 1-2 backups, and…” Oct 2, 22:20
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “This was a glorified Annual with A-List talent on the back-ups. And you know, if it was “only” an Annual,…” Oct 2, 18:09
- on Marco Speaks Spidey: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 – “Ravaged” Review: “When a creative team runs out of meaningful stories to tell about a character’s future, they inevitably start digging up…” Sep 30, 16:11
- on Spider-Variants of the Week 9/30/26: “Who’s getting all the ASM covers? You’d need to take out a loan. Thanks Mohammed for the work you do…” Sep 28, 23:55
- on Marco Speaks Spidey- Challenges of Doom: Spider-Man #1 Review: ““takes us back years for the previously untold first encounter between Peter Parker and Victor von Doom.” Wait, I thought…” Sep 10, 09:24
- on The Top Ten Most Wanted Spider-Man 1967 Figures: “I hope we get more toys from that cartoon.” Sep 8, 19:52
- on Marco Speaks Spidey: What If…? Jessica Jones #1 Review: ““Instead, Jessica’s Spider-Girl career helped make Peter’s career as a reporter.” This is a problem I have with a lot…” Sep 4, 06:03
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #35 (Legacy #999): “Gwen Gone Wild” or “Stroke of Bad Luck”: “@Evan Berry: I am on record as enjoying the Spider-Norman issues much more than the Peter-in-space issues. There was much…” Aug 30, 09:30
This was such a great issue when it came out because you legitimately felt that Peter felt that the upcoming battle with Doc Ock could be his final battle and he could die (even though as the reader you knew he wouldn’t really die). The entire issue is just Peter going around and saying good-bye to everyone without letting on that he’s saying good-bye for potentially the last time. There’s no (?) action at all, and yet the tension is so high you never feel bored by the lack of action. It’s sooooo good.