Marvel and DC are suing a Jerusalem store for selling kippa hats with licenesed heroes on them including Spidey. Kippa’s are caps that jewish men wear during times of prayer. According to this report the comic companies are suing for more than $25,000 in damages. What are your thoughts?
You might be interested in …
Spider-Man Helps Reunite the Spider-Friends
Spectacular Spider-Man voice actor Josh Keaton is going to help me get the 1980s Spider Friends reunited on a future podcast. I have gotten the ok from Firestar/Kathy Garver but have not heard back from […]
DAN SLOTT AND HUMBERTO RAMOS’ TOP-SECRET NEW SPIDER-HERO REVEALED!
(Marvel Press Release)Meet SPIDER-BOY in next week’s SPIDER-MAN #7! New York, NY— May 31, 2023 — Earlier this month, Marvel Comics teased a stunning character debut in Dan Slott and Mark Bagley’s SPIDER-MAN #7, and now […]
7 Comments
Leave a Reply
Support the Crawlspace on Patreon
Crawlspace Discord
Recent Comments
on Marco Speaks Spidey- Challenges of Doom: Spider-Man #1 Review: ““takes us back years for the previously untold first encounter between Peter Parker and Victor von Doom.” Wait, I thought…” Sep 10, 09:24- on The Top Ten Most Wanted Spider-Man 1967 Figures: “I hope we get more toys from that cartoon.” Sep 8, 19:52
- on Marco Speaks Spidey: What If…? Jessica Jones #1 Review: ““Instead, Jessica’s Spider-Girl career helped make Peter’s career as a reporter.” This is a problem I have with a lot…” Sep 4, 06:03
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #35 (Legacy #999): “Gwen Gone Wild” or “Stroke of Bad Luck”: “@Evan Berry: I am on record as enjoying the Spider-Norman issues much more than the Peter-in-space issues. There was much…” Aug 30, 09:30
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #35 (Legacy #999): “Gwen Gone Wild” or “Stroke of Bad Luck”: “@Hornacek – I sort of zoned out of the space issues of this run and preferred the Spider-Norman issues (which…” Aug 29, 15:57
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #35 (Legacy #999): “Gwen Gone Wild” or “Stroke of Bad Luck”: “@Evan Berry: That plan for Damage Control would make sense only if their original goal was to go after only…” Aug 28, 22:57
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #35 (Legacy #999): “Gwen Gone Wild” or “Stroke of Bad Luck”: “@Hornacek — Another great review! Wow, the second cover of issue #1000 makes it look like Spider-man cares about it…” Aug 28, 08:42
- on Marco Speaks Spidey: Spectacular Spider-Man: Brand New Day #4 Review: “This series just keeps getting better. The balance between Peter’s personal problems and the superhero chaos is working really well.…” Aug 20, 19:31
- on Marco Speaks Spidey: Amazing Spider-Man: Spider-Versity #5 Review: “You left out the best* part – Spider-Woman secretly kept a piece of (the entire?) Carnage symbiote for herself. I’m…” Aug 13, 09:31
Welp, time to make the obvious joke here. Marvel is owned by Disney and http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YAcIzPmOhBQ
Well the guy must have known what he could get into if he was violating copyright laws. He took a bargain, and it didnt pay off. I say he deserves this.
You notice Incredibeds! did everything legally…
Still, make some kind of deal with the guy, get a small back payment – $500, doubt he’s making conglomerate kind of money.
Then a modest royalty deal. THAT way, marvel and DC don’t come off looking quite so vicious, good PR.
I think it’s a shame when companies go after small businesses like this for damages instead of just sending a cease & desist. They don’t need the money, they’re just trying to “punish” the guy.
It wasn’t a smart move on his part, but suing him for 25,000 is needless. That’s undoubtedly a tremendous amount of money to him, but it’s almost nothing to these companies.
Maybe they could come to an agreement where they could offer Marvel and DC a Percentage.
Marvel is completely in their rights here. The above image is clearly based on a trademarked image, and if they were not making money off this, they could still probably still get away with “fair use”, however, because they are selling this, Marvel has a right to part of that pie.
First! I love this blog and have been a new follower for the past few months.
To be completely honest from the picture I see that there are more copy write characters on the kippas, not only Marvel.
Maybe it just so happens they sell the most of Marvel kippas, but I don’t think its fair to sue. Legally they don’t have a right to produce those kippas without the right cope write information. Marvel had to do what they have to do. There are probably millions of other companys and stores selling non copy writed products and I don’t see why they had to attck this one. Oh well.