Bertone, Donovan and Stella attended the Spider-Panel at the San Diego Comic Con. Don got in the first question and Bertone got one in too. The gang was front row on this one. Thanks gang for shooting this video.
You might be interested in …
Spider-Variants of the Week 6/18/25
What Variant Will You Be Picking Up This Week?
Variants of the Week 10/13/21
Will You Be Picking Up A Variant This Week? And don’t forget to check out the previews for this week’s releases as well Amazing Spider-Man #76/877 PREVIEWS Symbiote Spider-Man: Crossroads #4Miles Morales: Spider-Man #31Iron Man […]
Gwen Stacy Spider-Woman Gets Her Own Solo Series
Even before the release of Edge of Spider-Verse #2, Spider-Man fans have wondered if the alternate version of Gwen Stacy, who’d been bitten by the radioactive spider instead of Peter, would be getting her own […]
17 Comments
Leave a Reply
Support the Crawlspace on Patreon
Crawlspace Discord
Recent Comments
on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “@Paul Penna: “My guess, is that Cormac accidentally used his powers on his mother, accidentally erasing her memories when his…” Oct 7, 11:04- on Spider-Variants of the Week 10/7/26: “This thing may have more variants than ASM #1000.” Oct 6, 18:48
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “My guess, is that Cormac accidentally used his powers on his mother, accidentally erasing her memories when his powers first…” Oct 6, 11:27
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “@Paul Penna: I wouldn’t say I was liking Cormac before the Ravage reveal but his character was … “ok”. I…” Oct 4, 08:59
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “I’m surprised by how much I enjoyed Cormac Crane/Ravage. The story is well written, his powers are interesting and he…” Oct 3, 16:27
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “@Big John: Yeah, an annual is a good comparison. Annuals used to have one big story and 1-2 backups, and…” Oct 2, 22:20
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “This was a glorified Annual with A-List talent on the back-ups. And you know, if it was “only” an Annual,…” Oct 2, 18:09
- on Marco Speaks Spidey: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 – “Ravaged” Review: “When a creative team runs out of meaningful stories to tell about a character’s future, they inevitably start digging up…” Sep 30, 16:11
- on Spider-Variants of the Week 9/30/26: “Who’s getting all the ASM covers? You’d need to take out a loan. Thanks Mohammed for the work you do…” Sep 28, 23:55
- on Marco Speaks Spidey- Challenges of Doom: Spider-Man #1 Review: ““takes us back years for the previously untold first encounter between Peter Parker and Victor von Doom.” Wait, I thought…” Sep 10, 09:24
I wish they talked about the real “superior” spider man title and tease and give us more hints about the scarlet spider and let yost talk more.
Wow awesome seats you got!
Are the panels always so editor centered? I mean, Wacker was pretty much guiding the whole thing, I wanted more from Yost but it was ok.
@14 ouch
What question did Bertone ask?
I would actually look forward to him not being there. To not see him up on the panel I’d feel relieved not having to hear from or see him.
Roughly how many people were in the room?
Who cares if Slott attends SDCC? As long as Wacker is there, all is well.
Considering his well-documented issues with cutting deadlines pretty fine, I’m not that bothered or surprised by Slott and/or Wacker deciding flying Dan out to SDCC isn’t the best use of his time, especially since having him still participate remotely is pretty easy to do. I think he usually does NYCC instead, since he lives there and it’s less disruptive.
I do have an issue with Slott not showing this many years in a row. I’m not raged about it or anything but I think it’s important for him to be there to add some legitimacy to these things. 2011 and 2012 panels had big non-Spidey sections. Hashtag was being promoted in 2011 and Slott wasn’t there to champion his story. His enthusiasm would have gone a long way.
@8 – Would you say Jonathan Hickman won’t back up his upcoming Infinity event and deserves to get mocked just because he choose not to attend SDCC and be on the Infinity panel? That seems pretty excessive, creators aren’t obligated to make it to cons, sure it’s great for the fans when they do but their responsibility first and foremost is to get the books out.
@6- I’m sorry, if you have a panel on a story you created and you don’t show, you are going to get mocked. It makes it look like you can’t back up your own work regardless of the actual context.
My only problem is they called Smythe, Spider Slayer. The bugged me.
It’s not a big deal that Slott didn’t appear in person, yes it would have been nice but it doesn’t mean anything. Could just be that he is busy working on Superior. It’s sad that all the people making fun of Slott for not showing.
Slott hasn’t been to SDCC since 2010. Some suspected that his no-show this year was due to death threats, but it’s not the case.
@#2 HEYYOOOOOOO!!!!!
Lol, I think it was obvious that Slott is now terrified of not just the angry fans but to all the people he trolled online as well
AHAHAHAHAHA
He phoned it in, just like his writing on Superior
I don’t see Slott there..