Amazing Spider-Man #28
PLOT: The story is framed by showing an unidentified woman held captive in a closet by an unidentified man. Meanwhile at Randy Robertson’s request Peter delivers a TV to an amazon like woman named Fallon. It is obviously a set up and just as obvious that Fallon is not good for Peter. Peter returns home and finds out that Glory and Jill Stacy were also in on it although Randy had vouched for Fallon. Jill and Peter have a moment of staring longingly into each other’s eyes. Later that night while patrolling Spidey comes across the Enforces ambushing mobster Jimmy-6 and his family. Spidey fights awkwardly against the Enforces, enemies he should dispatch easily. While the fight continues we see that the mysterious captor from the beginning begins to feel the same sensations as Spidey. The webspinner finally prevails against the Enforcers and convinces Jimmy-6 to end the hostilities for the night. Returning to the scene of the beginning of the fight Spidey stands before a billboard that a worker just stripped to reveal an ad featuring Mary Jane while the mystery captor opens the closet door to reveal a woman who apparently is MJ.
LIKES: Joe Bennett subs for John Romita, Jr. on pencils here and does a nice job although he relies too much on shadow like progressions to illustrate Spidey’s acrobatics. Also any story that seems to bring MJ back to the book is certainly more than welcome. The Enforces are gangland foes of Spidey from way back in the days when the Green Goblin battled the Crime-Master for control of the Mob and their return is a nice touch. The cover by JR, Jr. is great (but what does it have to do with this issue?)
DISLIKES: The whole incident with Peter and Fallon which is suppose to be humorous is just plan flat and awkward. Compare Randy Robertson in Peter Parker: Spider-Man 28 and here and you’ll see how lame Mackie’s characterization is. None of the supporting characters have been major contributors to this book and that is one of the many short comings of Mackie’s run. The story with the Enforcers and Jimmy-6 is rather pointless, just like last issues story and plainly serves only to fill the space between the opening and closing bits with the kidnapper. Does anyone really have confidence that Mackie can bring the MJ saga to a satisfactory conclusion.
RATING:
![]()
web-heads out of 4: the extra ½ is for MJ’s apparent return.
HB 56
View articlesYou might be interested in …
The Chi-Town Breakdown: ASM #15 LGY#909
THE GIST OF IT… Dark Web is in full SWING! (Pun definitely intended). I’m here to give you a little insight on what this Nightmare Before Christmas issue brings us that even Tim Burton wouldn’t read. […]
The Amazing Spider-Man #690 Review
As Spider-Man battles Morbius, the Living Vampire in the streets of New York, The Lizard disguised as Curt Connors makes his way through the Horizon Labs staff until he finally perfects his formula to regain […]
Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #502 Review
Amazing Spider-Man #502 (#61) Intermezzo Number Two- “You want PANTS with that” Writers: J. Michael Straczynski Penciler: John Romita Jr. Inker: Scott Hanna PLOT: We get another single-issue storyline this month. This time, the story revolves around a New York […]
Crawlspace Discord

Social
Recent Comments
Hornacek on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “@Paul Penna: “My guess, is that Cormac accidentally used his powers on his mother, accidentally erasing her memories when his…” Oct 7, 11:04
Brad Douglas on Spider-Variants of the Week 10/7/26: “This thing may have more variants than ASM #1000.” Oct 6, 18:48
Paul Penna on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “My guess, is that Cormac accidentally used his powers on his mother, accidentally erasing her memories when his powers first…” Oct 6, 11:27
Hornacek on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “@Paul Penna: I wouldn’t say I was liking Cormac before the Ravage reveal but his character was … “ok”. I…” Oct 4, 08:59
Paul Penna on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “I’m surprised by how much I enjoyed Cormac Crane/Ravage. The story is well written, his powers are interesting and he…” Oct 3, 16:27
Hornacek on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “@Big John: Yeah, an annual is a good comparison. Annuals used to have one big story and 1-2 backups, and…” Oct 2, 22:20
Big John on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “This was a glorified Annual with A-List talent on the back-ups. And you know, if it was “only” an Annual,…” Oct 2, 18:09
Steve on Marco Speaks Spidey: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 – “Ravaged” Review: “When a creative team runs out of meaningful stories to tell about a character’s future, they inevitably start digging up…” Sep 30, 16:11
Brad Douglas on Spider-Variants of the Week 9/30/26: “Who’s getting all the ASM covers? You’d need to take out a loan. Thanks Mohammed for the work you do…” Sep 28, 23:55
Hornacek on Marco Speaks Spidey- Challenges of Doom: Spider-Man #1 Review: ““takes us back years for the previously untold first encounter between Peter Parker and Victor von Doom.” Wait, I thought…” Sep 10, 09:24

