THE AMAZING SPIDER-MAN #563 REVIEW

Now that the Merry Marvel Bullpen has finally fixed Spider-Man’s broken timeline, superstar creators like Bob Gale can bring us thrilling tales that the old status quo’s constraints made impossible – like the Enforcers in bumper cars!! In all seriousness, this cover could have been an instant classic, but the text ruins it. Why couldn’t they let the absurdity of the image speak for itself?

I’m gonna judge a book by its cover this time, because pummeling the reader over the head instead of just telling the story is a running theme in

THE AMAZING SPIDER-MAN #563
“So Spider-Man Walks Into A Bar And…”
WRITER: Bob Gale
PENCILS: Mike McKone
INKS: Marlo Alquiza
COLORS: Jeromy Cox & Antonio Fabela

Read the full review and leave a comment!

PLOT:
The Bar With No Name’s villainous patrons jump Spider-Man, but the bartender breaks up the brawl and tells Spidey where the Bookie lives. Our hero arrives at the house but only finds the Bookie’s father, Lester, who claims the Enforcers kidnapped his son because of his scam from last issue. Lester lets on that his son might know something about the Spider-Tracer Killings.

They swing over to Coney Island, where the Enforcers are tormenting the Bookie with the amusements. After a brief fight, the Enforcers surrender, but Lester accidentally reveals that he took bets on his own son’s rescue. Spider-Man makes the old man promise to donate his earnings to Aunt May’s soup kitchen. Also, the Bookie gives Spidey a lead on Tracer Killer: the tracers were planted on “victims” who had already died of natural causes.

THOUGHTS:
Saying this was Bob Gale’s best story is like saying vegetarianism was Hitler’s best character trait — it’s true, but it doesn’t earn him many points. A lot of fans, myself included, liked Gale’s previous issue, but that just means he’s batting one for six. #563 reemphasizes all of Gale’s annoying proclivities.

Gale annoyance #1: Boring stories. 563 basically tells the same story as 562: someone takes bets on a fixed Spider-Man fight, only this time it’s Lester Ladue instead of the Bookie. Gale should have developed the barroom brawl aspect more instead. Folks looking forward to an exciting fight against a bar full of villains will be disappointed to learn that, since none of them use their powers, it may as well have been a bar full of regular goons. Some might enjoy trying to name all the obscure z-listers, but what’s the point when they’re all just glorified props? The Tracer Killer clues only slightly mitigate this chapter’s irrelevance.

Gale annoyance #2: Dialogue. This marks the second time Gale’s Spider-Man teases a villain’s lack of witty dialogue. That quip must really tickle Bob for him to repeat it, but it just isn’t funny when the reader can’t distinguish the intentionally bad lines from everything else written by the crown prince of awful dialogue. An example: right before a roller coaster called “The Lightning” hits Spider-Man, the webhead says, “this gives new meaning to being hit by lightening!” Now that’s wit!

Gale annoyance #3: Belabored moralizing. Even the Freak arc’s anti-drug didacticism felt less tedious than this arc’s anti-smoking and anti-gambling messages. I love it when authors make moral points through stories (otherwise I would’ve hated Straczynski’s run), but not when they feel the need to talk down to their audience. How many times in one issue do we need to read that smoking gives one “tobacco breath” before we get the point?

Gale annoyance #4: Slapdash fourth wall breaking. A scene in which Aunt May’s pepper stew magically cures a homeless guy’s hurt leg would seem strange and out of place, but a handy caption assures us that this bit will have “major repercussions in the future.” Gale is so incapable of making the scene intriguing on its own merits that he has to break the fourth wall to TELL US how important it is.

Don’t mistake these criticisms for me saying that I hate this issue; I don’t. The writing isn’t terrible, just terribly mediocre, and you can buy it knowing you’ll read a more-or-less competent Spider-Man adventure. However, mere competence isn’t enough when a series demands a thrice-monthly commitment from its readers. Mediocrity, even in offbeat filler stories, is unacceptable.

RATING:
2.5 webheads out of 5. Take it or leave it, really. At least the art looks good.

REVIEWED BY: CrazyChris

Like it? Share it!
Previous Article

Podcast 37: Roger Stern Interview Pt 2

Next Article

Spider-Man:Web of Shadows Gameplay

You might be interested in …

11 Comments

  1. hi buddy… i just wanted to say that my opera is freezing when I click on the links… are you using some JavaScript or something?

  2. 72]ÂÕÎÄ íà ÏÎÐÍÎ ÑÀÉÒ

    46] ÂÕÎÄ

    http://pipiskun.land.ru/xr3/65.jpg http://pipiskun.land.ru/xr3/22.jpg
    http://pipiskun.land.ru/xr3/29.jpg http://pipiskun.land.ru/xr3/38.jpg
    http://pipiskun.land.ru/xr3/50.jpg http://pipiskun.land.ru/xr3/15.jpg
    http://pipiskun.land.ru/xr3/29.jpg http://pipiskun.land.ru/xr3/62.jpg

    46] ÏÎÐÍÎ

    72]ÑÀÌÎÅ ËÓ×ØÅÅ ÏÎÐÍÎ

    72]xxx çàãðóçèòü
    72]ïîðíóõà áäñì âèäèî ñêà÷àòü
    72]âèäåî ýðîòèêà ïîñìîòðåòü ñàéò

    ïîðíî ôèëüì çàãðóçèòü
    xxx âèäåî ïîñìîòðåòü ïîðòàë
    xxx ôèëüì ñêà÷àòü
    ïîðíî âèäåî ñêà÷àòü
    ïîðíóõà äâä çàãðóçèòü

    æåñòêèé ñåêñ ñìîòðåòü îíëàéí
    äåâóøêè ñåêñ ïîðíî
    ïîðíî äåâî÷êè äî 18
    ìîëîäîå ïîðíî – ïîðíî âèäåî ôèëüìû
    ïîðíî âèêà îíëàéí âèäåî
    ìàëîëåòêè îíëàéí àíàë
    ôîòî ãîëîé íàñòè çàâîðîòíþê
    ñåêñè äåâóøêè ôîòî
    ëåñáèÿíêè ïîðíî
    ïîäðîñòêîâûé ñåêñ ôîòî
    www ãåé ïîðíî ðó
    ñìîòðåòü ïîðíî ðîëèêè îí ëàéí
    ïîðíî ñ àëåíîé âîäîíàåâîé – ïîðíî âèäåî ôèëüìû
    ïîðíóõà âèäèî
    îðãàçì ïîðíî ñìîòðåòü
    ïîðíî ôîòî çâåçä ðîññèè
    ÷àñòíûå ïîðíî ôîòî àíàë ñåêñà
    ïîðíî ìîëîäûå
    ïîëîí ðîò ñïåðìû – ïîðíî âèäåî ðîëèêè
    ïîðíî îíëàéí ñî çíàìåíèòîñòÿìè – ñåêñ âèäåî ðîëèêè
    ñåêñ ïî ïðèíóæäåíèþ ãðóïïà
    ïðîñìîòð ïîðíî – ïîðíî âèäåî ðîëèêè
    æåíñêàÿ ìàñòóðáàöèÿ ðîëèêè
    àçèàòêè ïîðíî – ñåêñ ðîëèêè
    êàòÿ ïîðíî îíëàéí
    ãåé ïîðíî âèäåî
    ïîðíî ôîòî ãàëåðåè
    êàòÿ ñòðèæåíîâà ãîëàÿ
    ñåêñ ïîäðîñòêîâ ñìîòðåòü îíëàéí
    ÷ëåíû ìóæñêèå ñìîòðåòü
    ìèíåò
    ïîñìîòðåòü ïîðíóõó âèäåî ðîëèêè
    ëèçàòü àíóñ
    ïîðíî âèäåî áäñì ñêà÷àòü
    ïèñàþùèå äåâóøêè
    ëåñáèÿíêè ñêà÷àòü – ïîðíî âèäåî ôèëüìû
    æåñòêèé îðàëüíûé ñåêñ
    ñìîòðåòü òðàõ â ïîïó

    îíëàéí ïîðíóõà âèäåîðîëèê ïðîñìîòð
    ïîðíî ôèëüì ïîñìîòðåòü ñàéò
    îí-ëàéí ïîðåâî ñêà÷àòü
    îíëàéí ïîðåâî ðîëèê ïîñìîòðåòü
    èíòåðíåò ãîëûå dvd ñìîòðåòü
    xxx ðîëèê ïîñìîòðåòü
    îíëàéí sex film ñìîòðåòü ïîðíî-ñàéò
    online ãîëóþ ïðîñìîòð
    ïîðíî ôèëüì ñêà÷àòü
    xxx ïðîñìîòð
    îí-ëàéí ïîðíî âèäåî ïîñìîòðåòü
    èíòåðíåò xxx äâä ïîñìîòðåòü
    ïîðíî ôîòî ïîñìîòðåòü
    èíòåðíåò nude ðîëèê ñêà÷àòü ïîðíî-ñàéò

  3. Заметил такую тенденцию, что в блогах появилось много не адекватных комментариев, не могу понять, это что кто то спамит так? А зачем, чтоб падлу комуто сделать))) Имхо глупо…

  4. I think it’s a limitation of the creative team. When I think of my favorite comics, like Fables, Y The Last Man, JMS’ Spider-Man, Millar’s Ultimates, and Gaiman’s Sandman, one thing they have in common is that they are able to present gripping, subplot-laden stories without the use of those kind of captions. I’m never lost as to what I’m supposed to pay attention to, I can just naturally tell what is important and what will have consequences (if I’m supposed to be able to tell). If I have to be TOLD what is going o have ramifications, then it does it takes me out of the story and displays a contrast between writers like Gale and GOOD writers like the ones who created the series I mentioned.

    And I realize that there is more than one valid way to tell a comic book story, but this is one way that just seems to lack merit of any kind.

  5. Probably a bad setup or else it’s one of the limitations of the medium perhaps?

  6. Even beloved writers have their excesses. If the writing and art were enough to get you wondering about the mysterious man in shadow, then that text didn’t add anything. If the writing and art WASN’T enough to get you curious without that text, then that says something bad about the writing and art! Either way, when you see a comic breaking the fourth wall to convince you how exciting, mysterious, or important something is, then SOMETHING must have went wrong.

  7. A great cover hampered by too much text.
    Not the most interesting issue but it had it moments though all the betting and counter betting had my head in a spin.
    Loved the last panel – wonder was that influenced by the new animated show’s finales or just classic Spidey stuff?
    I disagree with your fourth point, Chris. Even during DeFalco’s classic run (just to mention one beloved spider-writer) we’d have panels such as “Who’s that mystery man in the shadows and why will he have a huge influence on Spidey’s life in the near future?”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *