Wow, gotta love this old clip. I wonder what ever happened to the actors playing the part of MJ and Spidey. What an odd PR clip. The question “Is marrying Spider-Man a risky thing for the strip” was never answered because Stan’s ear piece fell out towards the end. Funny stuff and worth a look.
Brad Douglas
View articlesBrad created the Crawlspace back in 1998 while attending college at the University of Missouri-Columbia. He’s the webmaster and writes front page news items, and also produces, hosts and edits the podcast. He’s been collecting Spider-Man comics since the age of three and is a life-long fan of the webhead. His website has been featured in USA Today, Entertainment Weekly and on Marvel.com and inside the comics themselves. The Crawlspace is one of the first Spider-Man fan sites to ever hit the internet. Millions of people visit the site every year.
Brad has interviewed several “Spider-Celebrities” over the years including co-creator Stan Lee. He’s also interviewed actors who have portrayed Spider-Man like Paul Soles (Voice Actor from the 67 Spider-Man Cartoon), Dan Gilvezan (Spidey Voice Actor from Spider-Man & His Amazing Friends) ,Yuri Lownthal (Voice Actor from the Spider-Man PlayStation game) and Nicholas Hammond (Spider-Man 1977 Actor).
You might be interested in …
Spider-Variants of the Week 3/5/25
What Variant Will You Be Picking Up This Week? CRAWLSPACE PREVIEWS
Amazing Spider-Man Video Game Trailer
Get More: GameTrailers.com, The Amazing Spider-Man – VGA 2011: Exclusive Debut Trailer HD, PC Games, PlayStation 3, Xbox 360
5 Comments
Leave a Reply
Crawlspace Discord

Social
Recent Comments
Hornacek on Panel(s) of the Day #1746: “So he’s wearing a mask with another mask over that one? Also, when is the last time we’ve had a…” Oct 17, 06:30
John Jackson on Spider-Tracer: Boomerang’s 10 Best Costumes: “He also had a different costume in the Spider-Man Lifeline mini series designed by Steve Rude.” Oct 16, 08:54
Hornacek on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “@Paul Penna: I just can’t imagine Cormac/Ravage being left around after this whole thing is resolved, to return periodically to…” Oct 11, 09:35
Paul Penna on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “Wow! Poochie came from another planet? “If all he does is use his powers to erase people’s memories to make…” Oct 10, 15:11
Brad Douglas on Marco Speaks Spidey: Midnight Spider-Man #1 Review: “What happened to Aunt May? Is that who Ben was calling?” Oct 10, 00:55
Evan Berry on Marco Speaks Spidey: Midnight Spider-Man #1 Review: “Don’t forget Uncle Ben’s ongoing lawsuit against Oscorp for the wrongful death of Peter’s parents, and Oscorp’s potential ulterior motive…” Oct 8, 14:53
Hornacek on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “@Paul Penna: “My guess, is that Cormac accidentally used his powers on his mother, accidentally erasing her memories when his…” Oct 7, 11:04
Brad Douglas on Spider-Variants of the Week 10/7/26: “This thing may have more variants than ASM #1000.” Oct 6, 18:48
Paul Penna on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “My guess, is that Cormac accidentally used his powers on his mother, accidentally erasing her memories when his powers first…” Oct 6, 11:27
Hornacek on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “@Paul Penna: I wouldn’t say I was liking Cormac before the Ravage reveal but his character was … “ok”. I…” Oct 4, 08:59


Dang. If only he answered that question….. Oh yeah, and thats useful saying ‘Spider-man, also known as Peter Parker’ on a news station. Isn’t that the reason OMD happened? jk.
Exactly Combustible.
Stan didn’t do it to enrich the chracters. he did it to boost a flagging syndication at the request of his paymasters. It was all about the money– now that’s a fact.
And the writers were capable they just weren’t interested. Some of Spider-Man’s greatest writers have said marrying them was a mistake. Heck, even Stan the man is digging the new direction. And the fans that do like the marriage can read the alternate universe stories so everyone can have their cake.
Zarius says:
October 11th, 2008 at 6:58 am
“It did exactly what Stan knew it would do….it enriched the strip and gave writers who could handle it a whole new dimension.”
Are you sure about that? Where did you read about Stan’s PR intentions? Or maybe he told you, right? I think he did it for the same reason your name links to TV Rage.
MJ didnt suffer at all, her character was enriched more or less and she became a role-model with how she coped with Peter balancing his lives with her. He suffered as Peter thanks to Harry, and suffered as Spidey because of his daily routines in the coustume. She turned to smoking, she overcame stalkers, she held her ground against Harry in the same apartment…she was a hero, an equal, a soul mate. Any objective fan can see that. Her best stuff arguably came from the 1990s era of the character, which was the last consistently good one for the original timeline/
It did exactly what Stan knew it would do….it enriched the strip and gave writers who could handle it a whole new dimension. Those that opposed it? They werent good writers or they were writers that didnt want to go beyond a certain comfort zone of what they “used to enjoy”. Feeble, weak, cowardly Nostaliga is what killed the marraige, and it’ll be the vicious cycle of nostalgia that brings it bac. Fact.
Besides, the marraige is still around. Quesada still likes it, he just didnt want it clogging up the mainstream title.
Ultimately it would have an effect on the strip. Marrying them gave the strip a publicity boost for sure. But MJ’s chracter suffered as a sucession of writers who had no real interest in writing a married Spider-Man shoe horned her into stories leaving us with a number of attempts to reboot Spider-Man and seperate the two.