I would like to thank everyone who sent in a sample review. I appreciate everyone that wants to help out with the site. However, Gerard’s review was just spot on. I like his writing style and he’s promised to have the reviews up quickly. Heck, he just got the job today and has already posted his first review.
He even said he could possibly get the reviews up the day they come out in the comic shops. So it’s with great pleasure that I welcome Gerard to the review staff. Welcome buddy, now get ready for all the pro and con comments that come with the reviews. Just ask Michael Bailey that people don’t hold back when you’ve got the main title.
You might be interested in …
Back Issue Reviews Now Much More Searchable!
Hey Crawl Spacers! In our continuing effort here at Crawl Space HQ to make this the best Spidey site it can possibly be for you, we’ve gone back through the entire archive of the current […]
THE MOST SHOCKING ISSUE OF AMAZING SPIDER-MAN IN 50 YEARS
Marvel sent over this press release. Spidey has been around for 61 years. Are they referencing Gwen Stacy’s death as the last “shocking issue?” What about One More Day in 2008? Discuss in the comments. […]
PS4 Spider-Man Review Podcast This Saturday @9pm Central Live
Have you been enjoying the new PS4 Spider-Man video game? We have too! This Saturday at 9pm central the Crawlspace crew will record a review of the game on an upcoming podcast. If you would […]
10 Comments
Leave a Reply
Support the Crawlspace on Patreon
Crawlspace Discord
Recent Comments
on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “I’m surprised by how much I enjoyed Cormac Crane/Ravage. The story is well written, his powers are interesting and he…” Oct 3, 16:27- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “@Big John: Yeah, an annual is a good comparison. Annuals used to have one big story and 1-2 backups, and…” Oct 2, 22:20
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “This was a glorified Annual with A-List talent on the back-ups. And you know, if it was “only” an Annual,…” Oct 2, 18:09
- on Marco Speaks Spidey: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 – “Ravaged” Review: “When a creative team runs out of meaningful stories to tell about a character’s future, they inevitably start digging up…” Sep 30, 16:11
- on Spider-Variants of the Week 9/30/26: “Who’s getting all the ASM covers? You’d need to take out a loan. Thanks Mohammed for the work you do…” Sep 28, 23:55
- on Marco Speaks Spidey- Challenges of Doom: Spider-Man #1 Review: ““takes us back years for the previously untold first encounter between Peter Parker and Victor von Doom.” Wait, I thought…” Sep 10, 09:24
- on The Top Ten Most Wanted Spider-Man 1967 Figures: “I hope we get more toys from that cartoon.” Sep 8, 19:52
- on Marco Speaks Spidey: What If…? Jessica Jones #1 Review: ““Instead, Jessica’s Spider-Girl career helped make Peter’s career as a reporter.” This is a problem I have with a lot…” Sep 4, 06:03
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #35 (Legacy #999): “Gwen Gone Wild” or “Stroke of Bad Luck”: “@Evan Berry: I am on record as enjoying the Spider-Norman issues much more than the Peter-in-space issues. There was much…” Aug 30, 09:30
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #35 (Legacy #999): “Gwen Gone Wild” or “Stroke of Bad Luck”: “@Hornacek – I sort of zoned out of the space issues of this run and preferred the Spider-Norman issues (which…” Aug 29, 15:57
Congratulations, Gerard! You belong now to a proud line of ASM reviewers.
congrats man
Congrats man!!!
Thanks for the warm wishes! And don’t worry, Bertone, I plan to kill everyone that reads my reviews!
Wait … that didn’t come out right … 😛
Great choice! Knock em dead!
Congratulations and well deserved!
Congrats, Gerard!
Congratulations Gerard!
Good luck! You’re gonna need it.
**GULP**