Hot on the heels of the Batman porn parody, Vivid Entertainment is ready to tackle Spider-Man. A report from Bleeding Cool says that the porn company will allegedly make parody films of Spidey, Hulk, Captain America and Thor. Is this legal? Is this legal parody? Discuss it in the comment section and on this thread on the message board.
You might be interested in …
Spider-Man 4 movie poster
Ain’t It Cool News has posted the image for the first poster of “Spider-Man 4”. No sign of Mephisto so it’s safe to say “One More Day: The Motion Picture” is out as a possibility. […]
BD Needs to Raise $800 for MDA and Jerry’s Kids
Gang on August 6th I’m going to be locked up behind bars for a good cause. The MDA has asked me to raise $800 to help kids with Muscular Dystrophy. I volunteered because I believe in […]
Previews: December 9th, 2020 (Incl. First Looks)
Amazing Spider-Man #54Spider-Man #5Venom #31King in Black: Namor #1Heroes at Home #1Captain Marvel #24*S.W.O.R.D. #1 First Look King in Black: Gwenom vs. Carnage #1*King in Black: Planet of the Symbiotes #1 *Possible/Confirmed Appearances Previews Provided […]
10 Comments
Leave a Reply
Support the Crawlspace on Patreon
Crawlspace Discord
Recent Comments
on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “@Paul Penna: I wouldn’t say I was liking Cormac before the Ravage reveal but his character was … “ok”. I…” Oct 4, 08:59- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “I’m surprised by how much I enjoyed Cormac Crane/Ravage. The story is well written, his powers are interesting and he…” Oct 3, 16:27
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “@Big John: Yeah, an annual is a good comparison. Annuals used to have one big story and 1-2 backups, and…” Oct 2, 22:20
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “This was a glorified Annual with A-List talent on the back-ups. And you know, if it was “only” an Annual,…” Oct 2, 18:09
- on Marco Speaks Spidey: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 – “Ravaged” Review: “When a creative team runs out of meaningful stories to tell about a character’s future, they inevitably start digging up…” Sep 30, 16:11
- on Spider-Variants of the Week 9/30/26: “Who’s getting all the ASM covers? You’d need to take out a loan. Thanks Mohammed for the work you do…” Sep 28, 23:55
- on Marco Speaks Spidey- Challenges of Doom: Spider-Man #1 Review: ““takes us back years for the previously untold first encounter between Peter Parker and Victor von Doom.” Wait, I thought…” Sep 10, 09:24
- on The Top Ten Most Wanted Spider-Man 1967 Figures: “I hope we get more toys from that cartoon.” Sep 8, 19:52
- on Marco Speaks Spidey: What If…? Jessica Jones #1 Review: ““Instead, Jessica’s Spider-Girl career helped make Peter’s career as a reporter.” This is a problem I have with a lot…” Sep 4, 06:03
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #35 (Legacy #999): “Gwen Gone Wild” or “Stroke of Bad Luck”: “@Evan Berry: I am on record as enjoying the Spider-Norman issues much more than the Peter-in-space issues. There was much…” Aug 30, 09:30
I’d be ok with a raunchy innuendo-filled “adult” parody that was supposed to be a comedy… but a full on “porn” flick gets a big ol’ Kevin Spacey “WRONG!” from me. Look how much publicity (on comic sites at least) this Batman thing has gotten since it’s announcement. I can only imagine that whenever the bleep it comes out it will be all over news headlines and some ignorant mother somewhere is going to flip out and get Batman banned from being in the library or crap like that. I sound really pessimistic about this, but since this doesn’t really have a good side either…
Well, if he’s gonna bang every girl in the comics…
@Donovan – What an age to live in, huh?
Just realized that both my favorite heroes are now pornstars. Wonderful.
I wonder if the Lizard will be in it?
Seems like every time Black Cat shows up in the comics it basically turns into a porn flick anyway. Might as well make a bad film huh.
On the legal issue, as a general rule parodies do not infringe on the intellectual property interests of the original work’s owner. If the porn company can convince a court that this is within the category of “parody,” then they probably can get away with it. I know know the very basics when it comes to intellectual property law, but there’s your general rule.
I am pretty sure there is already a Spider-man themed porno out there…anybody familiar with the low-budget “Spider-babe”?
Oh no…now all of Brad’s raunchy jokes will come true!
I don’t know if it’s legal or not, but after seeing the trailers for the “Batman XXX” film, I can’t wait! It looks like a parody with actual production value, and seems like it’s going to be amazingly true to the 60’s Adam West show.
Besides, it can’t be much worse than Spidey’s “sex-capades” with Black Cat recently…