Sacre Bleu! The next Spider-Man movie shall include Gwen Stacy played by Emma Stone, as reported by Comic Vine. What do you think about this casting? Another red-head to play a blonde!
Donovan Grant
View articlesTypical college aged comic fan who wants to write and draw in the biz
You might be interested in …
Latest CBR Poll shows over half of Spidey fandom still perfer him married
In a recent poll done by Comic Book Resources, 57% of current Spidey fans still perfer the character married than single. The article notes that this is notable difference than a poll taken two years […]
Spider-Variants of the Week 5/17/23
by Mohammed
Will You Be Picking Up A Variant This Week? And don’t forget to check out the previews for this week’s releases as well Miles Morales: Spider-Man #6Red Goblin #4Spider-Man 2099 Dark Genesis #3Venom #19 MILES […]
Spider-Variants of the Week 3/4/26
by Mohammed
What Variant Will You Be Picking Up This Week? Amazing Spider-Man #23 Incentive All-New Spider-Gwen: The Ghost-Spider #8
29 Comments
Leave a Reply
Crawlspace Discord

Social
Recent Comments
Hornacek on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “@Paul Penna: I wouldn’t say I was liking Cormac before the Ravage reveal but his character was … “ok”. I…” Oct 4, 08:59
Paul Penna on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “I’m surprised by how much I enjoyed Cormac Crane/Ravage. The story is well written, his powers are interesting and he…” Oct 3, 16:27
Hornacek on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “@Big John: Yeah, an annual is a good comparison. Annuals used to have one big story and 1-2 backups, and…” Oct 2, 22:20
Big John on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “This was a glorified Annual with A-List talent on the back-ups. And you know, if it was “only” an Annual,…” Oct 2, 18:09
Steve on Marco Speaks Spidey: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 – “Ravaged” Review: “When a creative team runs out of meaningful stories to tell about a character’s future, they inevitably start digging up…” Sep 30, 16:11
Brad Douglas on Spider-Variants of the Week 9/30/26: “Who’s getting all the ASM covers? You’d need to take out a loan. Thanks Mohammed for the work you do…” Sep 28, 23:55
Hornacek on Marco Speaks Spidey- Challenges of Doom: Spider-Man #1 Review: ““takes us back years for the previously untold first encounter between Peter Parker and Victor von Doom.” Wait, I thought…” Sep 10, 09:24
Treyvon Williams on The Top Ten Most Wanted Spider-Man 1967 Figures: “I hope we get more toys from that cartoon.” Sep 8, 19:52
Hornacek on Marco Speaks Spidey: What If…? Jessica Jones #1 Review: ““Instead, Jessica’s Spider-Girl career helped make Peter’s career as a reporter.” This is a problem I have with a lot…” Sep 4, 06:03
Hornacek on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #35 (Legacy #999): “Gwen Gone Wild” or “Stroke of Bad Luck”: “@Evan Berry: I am on record as enjoying the Spider-Norman issues much more than the Peter-in-space issues. There was much…” Aug 30, 09:30


I think Emma will do a great job. 🙂
Anybody know who the villian in this flick is?
Once again, another charismatic actor cast as a character with less charisma. That’s not to say that Gwen is a bad character, she just more serious, in my opinion.
Well if they make Gwen a dork like she was in Spectacular Spider-Man Emma Stone can totally play that like she did in The House Bunny. Depends on what they are going for. Still she’s a good actress so I’m sure she could pull anything off. Just get someone HOTTER than her to play MJ and it’s all good. ~_^
Didn’t thought of that. She may be very good for ultimate gwen but still I’d like a movie about the classic universe. not ultimate.
Considering Webb said he was using Ultimate Spidey as a refrence, I’m thinking she’ll be more Ultimate Gwen.
Oh, what was I thinking? I forgot that comic book movies will NEVER please comic book fans.
Maybe the producers and directors aren’t even trying this time around.
Perfect MJ. Overall facial appearance. Not just the hair color. Anyway didn’t someone say the demographics for the average Marvel movie customer isn’t necessarily a comic collector. They aren’t going to care what she looks like as long as the movie is interesting. What will impact the movie revenues is the lack of buzz with the character. I guess that’s a topic for another day.
I tottaly agree with Spider-Dad on post #5
I don’t see what the big deal is. I know it’s a lot of wishful thinking, but I hope we can see the Peter/Gwen relationship blossom and have them both go into college, only for a future sequel to see an adaptation of the Death of Gwen Stacy. MJ can be introduced there as well. You know, like in the comics? 😉
“According to The Hollywood Reporter, Mary Jane won’t be appearing in this movie.
Apparently the casting process involved looking for actresses for both characters and the studio was really into Stone for both characters. But as the search elongated, Columbia decided to focus on the more important role, Stacy.
According to sources, Mary Jane will not appear in the first movie. ”
FRACK!
I agree with most here. When I first heard her name being mentioned I thought she’d be a perfect MJ, can’t see her as Gwen yet, but OK, she’s a good actress so I’ll take it. I actually hope both are in the movie. Ideally I’d like to see Gwen be the love interest in the first movie. Have MJ in the mix and plant the seeds for their relationship for future movies…………..Oh, then we can have them get married by the 3rd movie in the series!……..and in Spider-Man IV:It’s Magic, we can have the Devil as the main villian and erase everything done before. The movie will suck ass and we can reboot again….good times. I tell ya, these movies write themselves.
WTF?!?!? This is retarded! GOD DAMNIT!!!!! She should be MJ!!! NOT GWEN!!!! FUCK!!!!
FFS!
We could’ve had a perfect MJ, but no, we can’t let MJ be a love interest in any medium. It might remind people that Peter and MJ were married.
awsome choice she is defently one of my favorite actors right now
She would have made a perfect MJ, not saying that she can’t pull off Gwen but good grief. @Nova1 watch Superbad she’s in that as well and did a great job.
Not sure about this. But that might be because the only movies I’ve seen with Emma Stone are Zombieland and Easy A.
YES….perfect Gwen….
but they say she is a natural blonde. even Marc Webb has said she is blonde
http://aintitcool.com/node/46894
Der, who cares about hair color? She’s a good actress and will be something to look forward to for this movie.
…She’s actually blonde, guys.
WHAT THE F***.
Ugh, total mis cast. TOTAL mis cast. They had the best MJ ever in the bag.
Has to be a BS report. HAS to be.
Why isn’t she cast as MJ? I don’t get it.
Don’t see it. Gwen was more of the nice girl, the daddy’s girl. I don’t see it in Emma. I can see MJ in those eyes…Gwen…nope.
I don’t know what to think about this, I was excited for her to play MJ, seems like that role would have been perfect for her. However, she is a good actress and I like her a lot (plus she’s a natural blonde despite what it says here) so I’m going to be optomistic about it.
WHAT THE HELL IS THIS!!!
Actually I believe MJ is confirmed to be in this…
Thus this makes NO sense as Stone, as agreed by a VAST maority of spider-fans that I have seen, would have been the PERFECT MJ
Actually, she’s a blonde that dyes her hair. 😉
And honestly, this makes me a little angry. Must we scrub Mary Jane out at every possible opportunity?