In the next few days you’ll see something I haven’t ever done with this site. I’m going to have two reviewers on one title. Gerard Delatour has been doing an outstanding job reviewing the Amazing Spider-Man title. He always gets the reviews out on time, has an opinion and gets people talking. Three key things I look for in a reviewer. Our good friend Michael Bailey who has reviewed the title in the past has agreed to come back on the title and offer his opinion on the book.
Having multiple reviewers on one book isn’t something I want to do on every title, just the flagship. It’s a common thing in newspapers and magazines to have multiple reviews of the same movie or book. So I look forward to having two voices on the main Spider-Book.
You might be interested in …
Previews: February 28th, 2018
Champions #17 Invincible Iron Man #597 (Mary Jane) Peter Parker: The Spectacular Spider-Man #300 Spider-Gwen #29* Spider-Man/Deadpool #28 X-Men: Blue #22 (Venom) Unbelievable Gwenpool #25 (Final Issue)* *NO PREVIEW AVAILABLE Previews provided by Comic Book […]
All New Wolverine Annual #1 Review (Spoilers)
Y’all remember that Ultimate Spider-Man story where Logan Howlett (Wolverine) swapped bodies with Peter Parker? Well, prepare for an All New retelling of this story with X-23 and Spider-Gwen! But is this a tale worth […]
Conan Rips on DC Comics
I know this isn’t Spidey related but I just had to share it. I’m a Marvel Zombie and it was awesome to see Conan rip into DC’s characters. I love the digs on Green Lantern. […]
8 Comments
Leave a Reply
Support the Crawlspace on Patreon
Crawlspace Discord
Recent Comments
on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #29 (Legacy #993): “Spore, Huh, Yeah, What Is He Good For? Absolutely Nothing, Say It Again, Y’all!”: “@Evan Berry: “Sha-la-la-laa!” What would we do baby … with out us? “Remember when Peter learned the ‘Way of the…” May 26, 18:24- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #29 (Legacy #993): “Spore, Huh, Yeah, What Is He Good For? Absolutely Nothing, Say It Again, Y’all!”: “@Hornacek — Sha-la-la-laa! Remember when Peter learned the “Way of the Spider” from Shang-Chi? That’s what the training with Daredevil…” May 26, 13:00
- on Spider-Tracer: Top Ten Spider-Man Characters Co-Created by Gerry Conway: “I have a soft spot for the Tarantula.” May 25, 11:08
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #29 (Legacy #993): “Spore, Huh, Yeah, What Is He Good For? Absolutely Nothing, Say It Again, Y’all!”: “@Aqu@: “Maybe I’m missing context, but since when Peter needs to train his spidersense with Daredevil?” Spidey was defeated by…” May 22, 06:13
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #29 (Legacy #993): “Spore, Huh, Yeah, What Is He Good For? Absolutely Nothing, Say It Again, Y’all!”: “I skimmed the review to see where we’re at with ASM nowadays, without spoiling myself too much since I’m still…” May 22, 05:52
- on MARCO SPEAKS SPIDEY: Spectacular Spider-Man: Brand New Day (2026) #1 Review: “This was a decent Spider-Man story. It mainly retells us about past events that have happened over the past years…” May 20, 22:10
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #27 (Legacy #991): “The Real Torment Was The Ending” or “MJ Lets Torment Go”: “@Jack: RIP Paul.” May 20, 01:40
- on New Marvel Legends Spider-Man 67 and Future Foundation Figures Revealed!: “Sold!!!” May 19, 23:18
- on New Marvel Legends Spider-Man 67 and Future Foundation Figures Revealed!: “I think that the hope is that people will buy more than one so that they can re-create the meme!…” May 19, 07:26
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #27 (Legacy #991): “The Real Torment Was The Ending” or “MJ Lets Torment Go”: “Hi everybody. Three years ago, I had a heart attack and a stroke. I’ve had lots of therapy. I’m feeling…” May 19, 04:51
That = a AMAZING call. Good going Brad!!!! Baily = win.
i am so glad you are doing this. i have always thought, that it would be great to have two different opinions on the main reviews. good job.
That sounds like a good idea. Im just glad its not on every title (aka the ones I review). I dont need someone making me look bad 🙂
“Shana, you ignorant slut!…”
Cool idea. Look forward to reading both reviews.
Here’s a thought; though it’s completly up to BD and Gerard; what if the ASM review had a new second reviewer every story arc? We’d hear different opinions on the title every story. I mean one arc we could have Bailey and Gerard agreeing on what they think but then in the next story arc you could have Gerard and myself disagree with one another while backing up why we think “this issue sucked/ was awesome”. Plus that way like WebbedSentry said, we don’t have to see Bailey repeat himself on the podcast… even though your cool and almighty Bailey and I have no problem with you… don’t hurt me please. 🙁
Just an idea I thought I’d throw out there.
But wont we be listening to Bailey on repeat then when he gives his reviews on the podcast? Not that more Bailey aint a bad thing
Huh. That should be interesting. I’m looking forward to reading the differing opinions on the book, as well as the differing reactions in the comments section.