In the next few days you’ll see something I haven’t ever done with this site. I’m going to have two reviewers on one title. Gerard Delatour has been doing an outstanding job reviewing the Amazing Spider-Man title. He always gets the reviews out on time, has an opinion and gets people talking. Three key things I look for in a reviewer. Our good friend Michael Bailey who has reviewed the title in the past has agreed to come back on the title and offer his opinion on the book.
Having multiple reviewers on one book isn’t something I want to do on every title, just the flagship. It’s a common thing in newspapers and magazines to have multiple reviews of the same movie or book. So I look forward to having two voices on the main Spider-Book.
You might be interested in …
Amazing Fantasy Returns
Marvel sent over this press release. Unfortunately the mini-series won’t get to issue #15. DISCOVER A BRILLIANT NEW VISION OF THE MARVEL UNIVERSE IN KAARE ANDREW’S AMAZING FANTASY #1 Acclaimed writer/artist Kaare Andrews returns to […]
First Look at Death of Ultimate Spider-Man
Marvel.com just sent me this press release about the upcoming Death of Ultimate Spider-Man story. ULTIMATE COMICS SPIDER-MAN #153 (DEC100542) [DoSM Prelude] Written by BRIAN MICHAEL BENDIS Pencils by SARA PICHELLI & DAVID LAFUENTE Cover by STEVE MCNIVEN […]
Venom #155 Review (Spoilers)
Well, VenomVerse is over and that means a bit of a breather until the Amazing Spider-Man crossover in December, which just revealed a very interesting role for Flash Thompson, and the X-Men Blue crossover in […]
8 Comments
Leave a Reply
Support the Crawlspace on Patreon
Crawlspace Discord
Recent Comments
on Marco Speaks Spidey- Challenges of Doom: Spider-Man #1 Review: ““takes us back years for the previously untold first encounter between Peter Parker and Victor von Doom.” Wait, I thought…” Sep 10, 09:24- on The Top Ten Most Wanted Spider-Man 1967 Figures: “I hope we get more toys from that cartoon.” Sep 8, 19:52
- on Marco Speaks Spidey: What If…? Jessica Jones #1 Review: ““Instead, Jessica’s Spider-Girl career helped make Peter’s career as a reporter.” This is a problem I have with a lot…” Sep 4, 06:03
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #35 (Legacy #999): “Gwen Gone Wild” or “Stroke of Bad Luck”: “@Evan Berry: I am on record as enjoying the Spider-Norman issues much more than the Peter-in-space issues. There was much…” Aug 30, 09:30
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #35 (Legacy #999): “Gwen Gone Wild” or “Stroke of Bad Luck”: “@Hornacek – I sort of zoned out of the space issues of this run and preferred the Spider-Norman issues (which…” Aug 29, 15:57
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #35 (Legacy #999): “Gwen Gone Wild” or “Stroke of Bad Luck”: “@Evan Berry: That plan for Damage Control would make sense only if their original goal was to go after only…” Aug 28, 22:57
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #35 (Legacy #999): “Gwen Gone Wild” or “Stroke of Bad Luck”: “@Hornacek — Another great review! Wow, the second cover of issue #1000 makes it look like Spider-man cares about it…” Aug 28, 08:42
- on Marco Speaks Spidey: Spectacular Spider-Man: Brand New Day #4 Review: “This series just keeps getting better. The balance between Peter’s personal problems and the superhero chaos is working really well.…” Aug 20, 19:31
- on Marco Speaks Spidey: Amazing Spider-Man: Spider-Versity #5 Review: “You left out the best* part – Spider-Woman secretly kept a piece of (the entire?) Carnage symbiote for herself. I’m…” Aug 13, 09:31
That = a AMAZING call. Good going Brad!!!! Baily = win.
i am so glad you are doing this. i have always thought, that it would be great to have two different opinions on the main reviews. good job.
That sounds like a good idea. Im just glad its not on every title (aka the ones I review). I dont need someone making me look bad 🙂
“Shana, you ignorant slut!…”
Cool idea. Look forward to reading both reviews.
Here’s a thought; though it’s completly up to BD and Gerard; what if the ASM review had a new second reviewer every story arc? We’d hear different opinions on the title every story. I mean one arc we could have Bailey and Gerard agreeing on what they think but then in the next story arc you could have Gerard and myself disagree with one another while backing up why we think “this issue sucked/ was awesome”. Plus that way like WebbedSentry said, we don’t have to see Bailey repeat himself on the podcast… even though your cool and almighty Bailey and I have no problem with you… don’t hurt me please. 🙁
Just an idea I thought I’d throw out there.
But wont we be listening to Bailey on repeat then when he gives his reviews on the podcast? Not that more Bailey aint a bad thing
Huh. That should be interesting. I’m looking forward to reading the differing opinions on the book, as well as the differing reactions in the comments section.