In the next few days you’ll see something I haven’t ever done with this site. I’m going to have two reviewers on one title. Gerard Delatour has been doing an outstanding job reviewing the Amazing Spider-Man title. He always gets the reviews out on time, has an opinion and gets people talking. Three key things I look for in a reviewer. Our good friend Michael Bailey who has reviewed the title in the past has agreed to come back on the title and offer his opinion on the book.
Having multiple reviewers on one book isn’t something I want to do on every title, just the flagship. It’s a common thing in newspapers and magazines to have multiple reviews of the same movie or book. So I look forward to having two voices on the main Spider-Book.
You might be interested in …
Marco Speaks Spidey: Spider-Man/Hulk: Fire and Brimstone #1 Review
When science fails, apparently you call an exorcist There are plenty of ways to begin a Spider-Man/Hulk team-up. Have them misunderstand each other. Throw in some gamma monster. Let Hulk smash something expensive while Peter […]
Spider-Variants of the Week 1/4/23
Will You Be Picking Up A Variant This Week? And don’t forget to check out the previews for this week’s releases as well Gold Goblin #3Spider-Man #4Joe Fixit #1Captain Marvel #45 GOLD GOBLIN #3 CRAWLSPACE […]
Wacker live chat starts at midnight
Starting at midnight, Steve Wacker will be live blogging for a 24 hour period using the “Cover it Live” application. You can check out the daily activities of the Spider-editor for the next day over […]
8 Comments
Leave a Reply
Support the Crawlspace on Patreon
Crawlspace Discord
Recent Comments
on Marco Speaks Spidey: Spectacular Spider-Man: Brand New Day #4 Review: “This series just keeps getting better. The balance between Peter’s personal problems and the superhero chaos is working really well.…” Aug 20, 19:31- on Marco Speaks Spidey: Amazing Spider-Man: Spider-Versity #5 Review: “You left out the best* part – Spider-Woman secretly kept a piece of (the entire?) Carnage symbiote for herself. I’m…” Aug 13, 09:31
- on MARCO SPEAKS SPIDEY: Amazing Spider-Man #34 Review: “So, Robbie effectively knows Peter is Spider-Man since Spidey told him that his cousin Cormac is Ben and May’s son.…” Aug 9, 13:40
- on 20th Anniversary Podcast Recording 08/08/26 LIVE CALLERS 7:30pm Central: “Andre, I was really touched with how many people called in and shared such fun and thoughtful stories of what…” Aug 9, 02:22
- on 20th Anniversary Podcast Recording 08/08/26 LIVE CALLERS 7:30pm Central: “Watching all those people being thankful for this (Crawl)space in which we can all virtually congregate and exchange tales of…” Aug 9, 00:10
- on 20th Anniversary Podcast Recording 08/08/26 LIVE CALLERS 7:30pm Central: “On it – already watching them live!” Aug 8, 19:31
- on 20th Anniversary Podcast Recording 08/08/26 LIVE CALLERS 7:30pm Central: “I am glad to watch both episodes tomorrow.” Aug 7, 23:39
- on Read’s Reads: Amazing Spider-Man #34/998 Review: “@Ryan – Ha — The closed-captioning calls you “Rage Reads.”” Aug 7, 10:03
- on Read’s Reads: Amazing Spider-Man #34/998 Review: “Was it just me or was the volume really low on this video? I had to crank my volume up…” Aug 6, 12:53
That = a AMAZING call. Good going Brad!!!! Baily = win.
i am so glad you are doing this. i have always thought, that it would be great to have two different opinions on the main reviews. good job.
That sounds like a good idea. Im just glad its not on every title (aka the ones I review). I dont need someone making me look bad 🙂
“Shana, you ignorant slut!…”
Cool idea. Look forward to reading both reviews.
Here’s a thought; though it’s completly up to BD and Gerard; what if the ASM review had a new second reviewer every story arc? We’d hear different opinions on the title every story. I mean one arc we could have Bailey and Gerard agreeing on what they think but then in the next story arc you could have Gerard and myself disagree with one another while backing up why we think “this issue sucked/ was awesome”. Plus that way like WebbedSentry said, we don’t have to see Bailey repeat himself on the podcast… even though your cool and almighty Bailey and I have no problem with you… don’t hurt me please. 🙁
Just an idea I thought I’d throw out there.
But wont we be listening to Bailey on repeat then when he gives his reviews on the podcast? Not that more Bailey aint a bad thing
Huh. That should be interesting. I’m looking forward to reading the differing opinions on the book, as well as the differing reactions in the comments section.