Agnes Garbowska gets in the Halloween spirit with this Zombiefied version of MJ!
You might be interested in …
Spider-Art #68
A flipped version of the “Parkers Doing Laundry” genre of imagery by Jay Bone. This one’s aimed for the ladies.
Spider-Art of the Day #178
A house sigil by Lokiable. Do we have any Game of Throne’s fans here? This got me wondering what motto would other Spider-characters follow? House Osborn? House Jamieson? What do you think? – Adam
Spider-Art #105
A classic piece by Charles Vess.
2 Comments
Leave a Reply
Support the Crawlspace on Patreon
Crawlspace Discord
Recent Comments
on Spider-Variants of the Week 10/7/26: “This thing may have more variants than ASM #1000.” Oct 6, 18:48- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “My guess, is that Cormac accidentally used his powers on his mother, accidentally erasing her memories when his powers first…” Oct 6, 11:27
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “@Paul Penna: I wouldn’t say I was liking Cormac before the Ravage reveal but his character was … “ok”. I…” Oct 4, 08:59
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “I’m surprised by how much I enjoyed Cormac Crane/Ravage. The story is well written, his powers are interesting and he…” Oct 3, 16:27
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “@Big John: Yeah, an annual is a good comparison. Annuals used to have one big story and 1-2 backups, and…” Oct 2, 22:20
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “This was a glorified Annual with A-List talent on the back-ups. And you know, if it was “only” an Annual,…” Oct 2, 18:09
- on Marco Speaks Spidey: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 – “Ravaged” Review: “When a creative team runs out of meaningful stories to tell about a character’s future, they inevitably start digging up…” Sep 30, 16:11
- on Spider-Variants of the Week 9/30/26: “Who’s getting all the ASM covers? You’d need to take out a loan. Thanks Mohammed for the work you do…” Sep 28, 23:55
- on Marco Speaks Spidey- Challenges of Doom: Spider-Man #1 Review: ““takes us back years for the previously untold first encounter between Peter Parker and Victor von Doom.” Wait, I thought…” Sep 10, 09:24
- on The Top Ten Most Wanted Spider-Man 1967 Figures: “I hope we get more toys from that cartoon.” Sep 8, 19:52
Once upon a time, Mary Jane Watson was the coolest, most refreshing and popular female character in comics (late 60s’, as mentioned by Gerry Conway in the recent Marvel tell all book). Stupid 90s’ and post 90s’ Marvel, for not knowing how to utilize such a lively character to her fullest capability.
To me for some rational reasoning I do believe Joe Queasda views Mary Jane’s character as a Zombie curse when it comes to why fans love the Spider-Marriage! I just saying that at the same time that this is cute for Halloween it hows how little of a character the comic company only wants her to be in the continually character: Now I’m not saying that at times during the marriage they could have had more interaction with other supporting cast members. What I saying is Marvel should still have two takes on the character and not limit any fans choice of how to enjoy Peter’s life as Spidey!