A photographer was able to snap some pictures of Shailene Woodley playing Mary Jane in the Amazing Spider-Man 2 movie. They were also able to snap a better picture of the new re-designed Spider-suit. What do you think of the new pics?
Brad Douglas
View articlesBrad created the Crawlspace back in 1998 while attending college at the University of Missouri-Columbia. He’s the webmaster and writes front page news items, and also produces, hosts and edits the podcast. He’s been collecting Spider-Man comics since the age of three and is a life-long fan of the webhead. His website has been featured in USA Today, Entertainment Weekly and on Marvel.com and inside the comics themselves. The Crawlspace is one of the first Spider-Man fan sites to ever hit the internet. Millions of people visit the site every year.
Brad has interviewed several “Spider-Celebrities” over the years including co-creator Stan Lee. He’s also interviewed actors who have portrayed Spider-Man like Paul Soles (Voice Actor from the 67 Spider-Man Cartoon), Dan Gilvezan (Spidey Voice Actor from Spider-Man & His Amazing Friends) ,Yuri Lownthal (Voice Actor from the Spider-Man PlayStation game) and Nicholas Hammond (Spider-Man 1977 Actor).
You might be interested in …
Homecoming Sequel News: Gyllenhaal as Mysterio?
The Hollywood Reporter is… well, reporting!… that actor Jake Gyllenhaal is “in talks” to play Mysterio in the upcoming Spider-Man: Homecoming sequel. From the Hollywood Reporter: Jake Gyllenhaal is ready to bring a little mystery […]
David Letterman Turned Down Cameo In Amazing Spider-Man Movie
Legendary late night talk show host David Letterman wasn’t up for making a cameo with Peter Parker. Letterman recently did an interview with Deadline. He talks about how he’s often approached about making a cameo […]
New Spidey Director Jon Watts On Spidey & The Reboot
New Spider-Man reboot director Jon Watts spoke with Superherohype.com about his own familiarity with Spider-Man and also gives a small update on starting work with the reboot’s writers, John Francis Daley and Jonathan M. Goldstein. […]
22 Comments
Leave a Reply
Social
Recent Comments
- Jeff Walling on The Chi✶Town Breakdown: USM #4 (2024): “I loved the issue – one thing that stuck out to me was how oily MJs hair looked in the…” May 2, 15:42
- Hornacek on The Chi✶Town Breakdown: USM #4 (2024): “@Evan – I went back and saw the “stain”. To me it just looks like a shadow or smudge -…” May 1, 15:58
- Evan Berry on The Chi✶Town Breakdown: USM #4 (2024): “@Chi-Town — It’s probably just a design choice, and I’m thinking too hard. 😀” May 1, 15:55
- Chi-Town Spidey on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #48 (Legacy #942): “The Doctor Will See You Now” or “The (Henry) Winkler Device Returns”: “*checks in* Yep, ASM still sucks…I’m glad Hornacek is covering reviews, otherwise we have to listen to Mark wine.” May 1, 15:04
- Chi-Town Spidey on The Chi✶Town Breakdown: USM #4 (2024): “Hornacek: Who do you think TAUGHT that to Mark? That’s why he calls me his “best friend”. Evan: Honestly, never…” May 1, 15:00
- Hornacek on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #46 (Legacy #940): “The Ravencroft Redemption” or “Anna Watson, Villain Rehabilitator”: “@Evan Berry: A two-parter makes more sense – a 1980s sitcom would not likely have a subplot going on for…” May 1, 13:49
- Hornacek on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #48 (Legacy #942): “The Doctor Will See You Now” or “The (Henry) Winkler Device Returns”: “@Aqu@: “IMO, the ‘behind the scene’ bit was in bad taste; it’s also unnecessary, since actions tell more than words.…” May 1, 13:42
- Aqu@ on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #48 (Legacy #942): “The Doctor Will See You Now” or “The (Henry) Winkler Device Returns”: “IMO, the “behind the scene” bit was in bad taste; it’s also unnecessary, since actions tell more than words. It…” May 1, 11:55
- Evan Berry on The Chi✶Town Breakdown: USM #4 (2024): “Sort of a nitpicky question, but what’s with the stain on Gwen’s right elbow in that panel with her introduction?…” Apr 30, 18:32
- Hornacek on The Chi✶Town Breakdown: USM #4 (2024): “I think it’s safe to say that this book – for at least the foreseeable future – will be “each…” Apr 30, 16:22
To all the naysayers, this is how I feel:
http://blogs.indiewire.com/criticwire/the-embarrassing-spider-fans
the girl who plays richard castle’s daughter on castle whould have been perfect. her name is molly quinn.
Yeah, c’mon guys. You’re judging pictures of her walking to the set in comparison to what Emma Stone looks like in a finished movie scene.
I don’t think she’s filming yet. No makeup. Woodley is a real cutie, and I think she’ll do just fine in the role. Better then Kirsten Dunst, anyway.
@ #17 It’s well, well, well past cliche.
‘Kay, then?! 😉
“Getting to be” Herbie? It’s well past! Batman Returns, Spidey 1-3, Amazing Spidey, Iron Man, Daredevil, the list goes on!
her hair needs to be more red
i just hope the mask stays in one piece in this movie!
Having it get ripped and torn and demolished is getting to be cliche.
Wow, who casted this one. I would rather have Emma Stone play both.
@ #1: I agree
@ #8: Kirsten? She’s beautiful, of course she looked good in the role
#8 – yes. Despite whatever problems you had with Kristen in the SM1-3, she was beautiful.
#9 – I hated to post that since I thought she was great in The Descendants and looked beautiful in it. I couldn’t believe this was the same actress. If she looked like she did in TD I would say “ok, they picked the right actress at least for the look” but based on these pictures she doesn’t look attractive enough to portray MJ, who let’s face it, according to the Lee/Ditko stories, is supposed to be gorgeous.
Shailene Woodley is a pretty girl and very good actress. The pictures here are admittedly somewhat unflattering, but I have a feeling that she wil be a great MJ. Either way she has to be better than Kirsten Dunst was.
Let’s be nice to this girl. However unlikely, she might read these comments. While I see the point @#1, let’s face it – almost no one looks like a woman from a comic book. Those that might have probably had work done. I don’t know the actress, but she might have enough personality to pull off MJ, which by the way, will be the most important factor. She has to be able to charm us down to our socks when she says, “face it tiger…”
@#8 – point well taken. I don’t think she had the charm of MJ, which didn’t help.
@#1
And Kirsten was?
MAKE UP PLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEASE
The suit looks great, and so does MJ. I’ve seen a picture of Garfield in the old suit from the first movie, so maybe we’ll get to see the transition from one to the other in the second movie. Personally I think Gwen will have some input with the new suit, because after all, Gwen’s as clever as Peter in this movie universe of Spidey. I don’t understand how the new suit is already garnering its detractors. In my opinion its even closer to the comic version of the suit than even the Raimi suit was. I guess there’s no pleasing some geeks out there.
I think this scene will be taking place at the Parker residence, with Spidey just back from busting some goonies. Cue Aunt May introducing Peter to Anna Watson’s wonderful niece and voila, you have “Face it tiger, you just hit the jackpot!”
Well, that’s how I think it will go down anyway. Would be cool. Also, she will be wearing make-up for the final shot, which, along with the proper lighting and post production work, will make a helluva difference.
@ #2 “high school version”– Have you SEEN Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #42 ?
Well, as I’ve been telling almost everyone, she looks a LOT better with make-up. And she actually does look like Mary-Jane in her first appearance.
I’m happy to see a more classic version of the suit with the belt back and the leg stripe gone!
I think she looks fine for a high school version of Mary Jane. I don’t think they’re going for supermodel Mary Jane, and I never liked the supermodel thing anyway.
I’m sorry, but this actress doesn’t seem attractive enough to play Mary Jane.