According to Comicbookmovie.com – yes, played by Colm Feore:
(Potential spoilers at the first link above)
We’ve managed to confirm that Feore will be playing a character from classic Spidey lore in Marc Webb’s sequel to The Amazing Spider-Man. Plus, find out how this character ties in with the film’s villains to…well, you’ll have to click for more!
There’s not much else on this right now other than rampant Sinister Six speculation.
–George Berryman!
Via CBR. November brings the last issues of the excellent Superior Foes of Spider-Man and the story-challenged New Warriors, which features Kaine. Superior ends with #17, New Warriors ends with #12. Either way, congrats to […]
Will You Be Picking Up A Variant This Week? And don’t forget to check out the previews for this week’s releases as well Hallows’ Eve #3 Extreme Venomverse #2Spider-Man 2099: Dark Genesis #4Daredevil & Echo […]
Marvel Chief Creative Officer Joe Quesada spoke with IGN about Spidey’s new costume. No, not that laughable new one with the Green Lantern crap on Spidey’s chest. The new movie costume, which is most definitely […]
on Podcast #823-Amazing Spider-Man#939-941: ““I want to see some pictures of you guys in Crawlspace shirts.” But I haven’t gotten any Crawlspace shirt. 🙁” May 17, 17:27
on Panel(s) of the Day #1552: “@Hornacek – P.S. – This might sound crazy, considering how popular and oft-referenced it is, but I completely forgot about…” May 17, 15:55 on Panel(s) of the Day #1552: “Of course. McFarlane’s SM #1 has “THE LEGEND OF THE ARACHKNIGHT” written on it.” May 17, 15:24 on Panel(s) of the Day #1552: “@Hornacek — Remember the days of the “Arach-knight”? Not the Spider-man / Moon Knight amalgamation, but the Todd McFarlane’s darker…” May 17, 15:19 on Panel(s) of the Day #1552: “This scene looks like Spidey should be saying “Swear to me!”” May 17, 14:13 on Spider-Man: TAS 26 year old cliffhanger, RESOLVED.: “@Chi-Town — I agree completely regarding the real Mary Jane’s marrying Peter. If Spider-man ’98 got made, I would love…” May 16, 18:18
on Spider-Man: TAS 26 year old cliffhanger, RESOLVED.: “@Evan: I was debating as well if I should post this the day of, when that episode came out. Did…” May 16, 13:27 on Spider-Man: TAS 26 year old cliffhanger, RESOLVED.: “@Chi-Town — I came to the Crawlspace this morning because I watched episode 10 of X-Men ’97 last night and…” May 16, 11:59
on Spider-Tracer: Let’s Talk “Spider-Man ’98″…: “Guys, tonight’s season finale of “X-Men ’97” is gonna intrigue the hell out of some of you!!! And that’s all…” May 16, 02:17
Apple Podcasts
Google Podcasts
Spotify
Pandora
Amazon Music
iHeartRadio
Podbean
Amazon Alexa
Player.fm
Listen Notes
Stitcher
‘ Every online shopping website has to be encrypted.
Provided shipping of goods is handled in an eco-friendly manner, the effects of
shopping online can be even more positive. Similarly, you can evaluate some the design and pattern of the
best wedding dresses to impress the onlookers by hiding your imperfect body parts.
Spider-man has always been a backdrop for the soap opera of Peter’s life. In the earlier issues (and Ultimate) they had a teen angst serial going over a multi-issue arc while Spidey fought a different villan every issue or sometimes two. I am hoping the movie follows that formula. Thats where SM3 failed.
@#10 Very true. That’s a good point.
As much as it feels overstuffed, people keep forgetting that these villains were never massively fleshed out, and superhero movies need to learn that, sometimes, a superpowered crook can be a superpowered crook. We don’t need him to have an emotionally powered backstory, and we can introduce him as a guy just turning up to give Spidey something to tussle with as a ‘day in the life of Spidey’ moment. Hell, Ultimate Spiderman pulled this off constantly, and was able to introduce villains such as the shocker in this way without overstuffing the storyline.
>tt<
Like we need a third villain for this movie
The Vulture? Absolutely! Rather in the third than in this one, but either way I want to see Spidey and Toomes battle it out above New York …
Please no. The only way Vulture should make it into this movie is a passing reference at best, or maybe a collage of a battle while the opening titles roll.
I was going to say Don is officially against this movie.
What? NO0O0O0O0O0O0O0O0O0OO00O00!!!!! Not the Vulture!
I think the Sinister Six COULD work in a Spider-Man movie, but only if they were set up properly, over a few films…like they did with the Avengers.
But I don’t know about this rumor. We’ve already got Electro, Rhino, and (possibly) the Goblin…introducing another villain just sounds like overkill.
That being said, this guy does have the look of the Vulture though.
So I take it you dont want a Sinister Six in neither this or the next film? I´m also a bit worried this film will be over-stuffed already, but I´m gonna try and stay positive as long as I can. And this Vulture thing is still a rumour right?
Yes, because overstuffing your sequels with villains always works well for superhero film franchises.
I saw they also had started the rumor that there were set pics of Norman Osborn as the Goblin, but I think thats false, it would also be smarter to just introduce these guys in their civilian identities, and then bring them in as Sinister Six in the 3rd film. Let Electro shine in this one(no pun intended).