Which cover do you
like better?
You might be interested in …
Is Michael Keaton Getting Ready To Fly Into A Spider-Web?
He’s been a Batman. He’s been a Birdman. And now he may don wings once more and take to the skies fighting Spider-Man. According to Variety, Michael Keaton is in “early talks” to play the […]
Spider-Variants of the Week 9/4/24
What Variant Will You Be Picking Up This Week? CRAWLSPACE PREVIEWS EXTRA VARIANTS OF THE WEEK Moon Knight Annual #1 by Mike McKone
Oscorp in Amazing Spider-Man Movie
Twitter user Claimo was able to snap some pictures of the set of the “Amazing Spider-Man” movie. It seems Oscorp will be in the movie. JR will be very happy. Just Jared also has posted […]
10 Comments
Leave a Reply
Support the Crawlspace on Patreon
Crawlspace Discord
Recent Comments
on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #29 (Legacy #993): “Spore, Huh, Yeah, What Is He Good For? Absolutely Nothing, Say It Again, Y’all!”: “@Evan Berry: “Sha-la-la-laa!” What would we do baby … with out us? “Remember when Peter learned the ‘Way of the…” May 26, 18:24- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #29 (Legacy #993): “Spore, Huh, Yeah, What Is He Good For? Absolutely Nothing, Say It Again, Y’all!”: “@Hornacek — Sha-la-la-laa! Remember when Peter learned the “Way of the Spider” from Shang-Chi? That’s what the training with Daredevil…” May 26, 13:00
- on Spider-Tracer: Top Ten Spider-Man Characters Co-Created by Gerry Conway: “I have a soft spot for the Tarantula.” May 25, 11:08
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #29 (Legacy #993): “Spore, Huh, Yeah, What Is He Good For? Absolutely Nothing, Say It Again, Y’all!”: “@Aqu@: “Maybe I’m missing context, but since when Peter needs to train his spidersense with Daredevil?” Spidey was defeated by…” May 22, 06:13
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #29 (Legacy #993): “Spore, Huh, Yeah, What Is He Good For? Absolutely Nothing, Say It Again, Y’all!”: “I skimmed the review to see where we’re at with ASM nowadays, without spoiling myself too much since I’m still…” May 22, 05:52
- on MARCO SPEAKS SPIDEY: Spectacular Spider-Man: Brand New Day (2026) #1 Review: “This was a decent Spider-Man story. It mainly retells us about past events that have happened over the past years…” May 20, 22:10
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #27 (Legacy #991): “The Real Torment Was The Ending” or “MJ Lets Torment Go”: “@Jack: RIP Paul.” May 20, 01:40
- on New Marvel Legends Spider-Man 67 and Future Foundation Figures Revealed!: “Sold!!!” May 19, 23:18
- on New Marvel Legends Spider-Man 67 and Future Foundation Figures Revealed!: “I think that the hope is that people will buy more than one so that they can re-create the meme!…” May 19, 07:26
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #27 (Legacy #991): “The Real Torment Was The Ending” or “MJ Lets Torment Go”: “Hi everybody. Three years ago, I had a heart attack and a stroke. I’ve had lots of therapy. I’m feeling…” May 19, 04:51
I love the black and white rough sketch more than the final product, personally. There’s action going on in the final print, but Carnage looks more menacing and intimidating to Spidey. Plus, the background with the environment and different inanimate objects make both characters stand out much better in the pencil rough draft. Spider-Man’s perspective looks off in the final print when he’s supposed to be behind Carnage.
As others have stated on here I too prefer the published cover as it makes Carnage more threatening and stand out. The unpublished cover looks amazing but more suited to a splash page in that issue.
As others have stated on here I too prefer the published cover as it makes Carnage more threatening and stand out. T
Hey everyone – I agree that Marvel choose the correct cover.
I know this is way off topic, but I just tried to visit Sam Ruby’s old web site. It is totally gone! I know it has not been up dated for years, but it was still a great site to view covers and get educated on some Spidey history. I don’t know why the site was abandoned in the first place, but I will miss it. Does anyone know the story behind this?
I hope I am not out of line asking about this on the Crawl Space.
The rejected cover makes the reader think that he’s just another villain, as Spidey looks at him and say “Oh, another bad-guy.”
The published cover makes the reader think “Oh BLEEP, Spidey is helpless against this guy, and he’s not doing anything, just standing there while these tiny tendrils incapacitate Spidey!”
Both are good, but I think the final version makes for the better cover. The rejected art looks like it would be better suited as a splash page at the end of an issue.
Funnily enough I just framed and hung this issue on my wall! However, I do prefer the unpublished cover.
I’ve always loved the original #361 cover, as Bagley’s style splashes off the page. As a kid I’m like “WTH IS HE DOING TO SPIDER-MAN?!?!?!” The orginal cover’s a good cover, but it’s not as threatening as the printed version, an thus not as dynamic.
I prefer the published cover. The white background makes Spidey and Carnage stand out. Also, I like how Carnage’s head is drawn. I guess the round shape makes him look different to Venom?
I think the Carnage illustration on the unpublished cover looks better, but I like the more action oriented published cover. The unpublished one just looks like Spidey was interrupted from relaxing in a bunch of rubble.