Which cover do you
like better?
You might be interested in …
King in Black #5 Preview
Marvel sent over this preview. It will be on sale next Wednesday. Will you pick it up?
Spider-Variants of the Week 12/28/22
Will You Be Picking Up A Variant This Week? And don’t forget to check out the previews for this week’s releases as well Amazing Spider-Man #16Deadly Neighborhood Spider-Man #3Peter Parker & Miles Morales: Spider-Men Double […]
Black Suit Coming To Disney Infinity 3.0
Via Gamezone: When the Disney Infinity community questioned why Black Suit Spider-Man was featured in 3.0’s collection menu, John Vignocchi denied that there were ever plans to release the character — who was exclusive to […]
10 Comments
Leave a Reply
Support the Crawlspace on Patreon
Crawlspace Discord
Recent Comments
on Read’s Reads Amazing Spider-Man #28/992: “I was sad to read in the letters page about John Romita JR stepping away from ASM. It did seem…” May 12, 11:01- on Spider-Tracer: Top Ten Spider-Man Characters Co-Created by Gerry Conway: ““Glory Grant was J. Jonah Jameson’s secretary for years, and even lived in the same apartment as Peter Parker for…” May 12, 06:11
- on Spider-Variants of the Week 5/13/26: “I love that avengers variant cover homage to avengers: age of ultron 2015 movie poster.” May 11, 20:20
- on Read’s Reads Amazing Spider-Man FCBD 2026 Review: “When I saw The Answer I thought at first he’d be treated like a joke, when Slott brought back F.A.C.A.D.E.…” May 7, 12:58
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #27 (Legacy #991): “The Real Torment Was The Ending” or “MJ Lets Torment Go”: “@Hornacek – I definitely remember that story. It was The Last Temptation of Eddie Brock from 2007, part of the…” May 7, 07:27
- on MARCO SPEAKS SPIDEY- Marvel/DC: Spider-Man/Superman #1 REVIEW: “Just bought this book, the first comic i’ve actually bought in a while, and yes the first story was very…” May 6, 21:12
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #27 (Legacy #991): “The Real Torment Was The Ending” or “MJ Lets Torment Go”: “@Aqu@: I read all of the 90s Venom mini-series and I don’t remember it ever being said there that Eddie…” May 5, 10:22
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #27 (Legacy #991): “The Real Torment Was The Ending” or “MJ Lets Torment Go”: “Aand that happens when you’re interrupted when writing a comment. It got cut. *history (but it does check out with…” May 5, 07:03
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #27 (Legacy #991): “The Real Torment Was The Ending” or “MJ Lets Torment Go”: ““No consistency among *today’s different Marvel writers” Mmh, from a quick look at a wiki, it seems Venom only convinced…” May 5, 06:58
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #27 (Legacy #991): “The Real Torment Was The Ending” or “MJ Lets Torment Go”: “@Aqu@: “It’s also unfortunately true that symbiotes’ abilities often change from writer to writer.” Wait a minute, you’re telling me…” May 4, 09:11
I love the black and white rough sketch more than the final product, personally. There’s action going on in the final print, but Carnage looks more menacing and intimidating to Spidey. Plus, the background with the environment and different inanimate objects make both characters stand out much better in the pencil rough draft. Spider-Man’s perspective looks off in the final print when he’s supposed to be behind Carnage.
As others have stated on here I too prefer the published cover as it makes Carnage more threatening and stand out. The unpublished cover looks amazing but more suited to a splash page in that issue.
As others have stated on here I too prefer the published cover as it makes Carnage more threatening and stand out. T
Hey everyone – I agree that Marvel choose the correct cover.
I know this is way off topic, but I just tried to visit Sam Ruby’s old web site. It is totally gone! I know it has not been up dated for years, but it was still a great site to view covers and get educated on some Spidey history. I don’t know why the site was abandoned in the first place, but I will miss it. Does anyone know the story behind this?
I hope I am not out of line asking about this on the Crawl Space.
The rejected cover makes the reader think that he’s just another villain, as Spidey looks at him and say “Oh, another bad-guy.”
The published cover makes the reader think “Oh BLEEP, Spidey is helpless against this guy, and he’s not doing anything, just standing there while these tiny tendrils incapacitate Spidey!”
Both are good, but I think the final version makes for the better cover. The rejected art looks like it would be better suited as a splash page at the end of an issue.
Funnily enough I just framed and hung this issue on my wall! However, I do prefer the unpublished cover.
I’ve always loved the original #361 cover, as Bagley’s style splashes off the page. As a kid I’m like “WTH IS HE DOING TO SPIDER-MAN?!?!?!” The orginal cover’s a good cover, but it’s not as threatening as the printed version, an thus not as dynamic.
I prefer the published cover. The white background makes Spidey and Carnage stand out. Also, I like how Carnage’s head is drawn. I guess the round shape makes him look different to Venom?
I think the Carnage illustration on the unpublished cover looks better, but I like the more action oriented published cover. The unpublished one just looks like Spidey was interrupted from relaxing in a bunch of rubble.