Which cover do you
like better?
You might be interested in …
Spidey and Marvel Slott Machines
It seems Marvel and DC will be licensing their character to be on slott machines across the country. This new report gives details. Here are some videos of the Spidey ones currently out there. I […]
Andrew Garfield Talks Leaving Spider-Man Behind
Andrew Garfield recently did an interview with Variety magazine. He was promoting the movie “Hacksaw Ridge.” During the course of the interview it drifted into Spider-Man talk. It’s an interesting interview that starts at the […]
10 Comments
Leave a Reply
Support the Crawlspace on Patreon
Crawlspace Discord
Recent Comments
on MARCO SPEAKS SPIDEY: VENOM #257 REVIEW: “I know this is part of a crossover event, but for an issue of Venom, the character of Venom had…” Apr 15, 11:14- on MARCO SPEAKS SPIDEY: The Amazing Spider-Man #26 Review: “@Zach and Evan Berry: I don’t remember anything about a broken leg. I just went back and skimmed the space…” Apr 15, 10:38
- on MARCO SPEAKS SPIDEY: The Amazing Spider-Man #26 Review: “@Evan Berry: “I still don’t like that Mary Jane said to Eddie Brock, ‘Don’t die so I don’t have to…” Apr 15, 10:32
- on MARCO SPEAKS SPIDEY: The Amazing Spider-Man #26 Review: “@Dark Mark — I think you mean “Rek-Rap.” 😛” Apr 14, 09:18
- on MARCO SPEAKS SPIDEY: The Amazing Spider-Man #26 Review: “@Evan – I think it is the literature teacher in me – I am used to better authors crafting things…” Apr 13, 15:55
- on MARCO SPEAKS SPIDEY: The Amazing Spider-Man #26 Review: “@Dark Mark — That explanation is certainly worthy of a No-Prize! I love it when something can be explained in…” Apr 13, 14:56
- on MARCO SPEAKS SPIDEY: The Amazing Spider-Man #26 Review: “@Evan – you are right – that line was off for everything we know about MJ and Peter’s relationship. I’ll…” Apr 13, 10:10
- on MARCO SPEAKS SPIDEY: The Amazing Spider-Man #26 Review: “@Zach — Typos galore. Let me try that again: I wondered about that myself. Since I sort of skimmed the…” Apr 13, 09:02
- on MARCO SPEAKS SPIDEY: The Amazing Spider-Man #26 Review: “@Zach — I wondered about that myself. Since I sort of skimmed the space issues, I figured it was a…” Apr 13, 06:49
I love the black and white rough sketch more than the final product, personally. There’s action going on in the final print, but Carnage looks more menacing and intimidating to Spidey. Plus, the background with the environment and different inanimate objects make both characters stand out much better in the pencil rough draft. Spider-Man’s perspective looks off in the final print when he’s supposed to be behind Carnage.
As others have stated on here I too prefer the published cover as it makes Carnage more threatening and stand out. The unpublished cover looks amazing but more suited to a splash page in that issue.
As others have stated on here I too prefer the published cover as it makes Carnage more threatening and stand out. T
Hey everyone – I agree that Marvel choose the correct cover.
I know this is way off topic, but I just tried to visit Sam Ruby’s old web site. It is totally gone! I know it has not been up dated for years, but it was still a great site to view covers and get educated on some Spidey history. I don’t know why the site was abandoned in the first place, but I will miss it. Does anyone know the story behind this?
I hope I am not out of line asking about this on the Crawl Space.
The rejected cover makes the reader think that he’s just another villain, as Spidey looks at him and say “Oh, another bad-guy.”
The published cover makes the reader think “Oh BLEEP, Spidey is helpless against this guy, and he’s not doing anything, just standing there while these tiny tendrils incapacitate Spidey!”
Both are good, but I think the final version makes for the better cover. The rejected art looks like it would be better suited as a splash page at the end of an issue.
Funnily enough I just framed and hung this issue on my wall! However, I do prefer the unpublished cover.
I’ve always loved the original #361 cover, as Bagley’s style splashes off the page. As a kid I’m like “WTH IS HE DOING TO SPIDER-MAN?!?!?!” The orginal cover’s a good cover, but it’s not as threatening as the printed version, an thus not as dynamic.
I prefer the published cover. The white background makes Spidey and Carnage stand out. Also, I like how Carnage’s head is drawn. I guess the round shape makes him look different to Venom?
I think the Carnage illustration on the unpublished cover looks better, but I like the more action oriented published cover. The unpublished one just looks like Spidey was interrupted from relaxing in a bunch of rubble.