Our friend Adam had to step down from his duties of reviewing the All New Ultimates book and the Miles Morales Ultimate Spider-Man book. I”m looking for someone to review both or one of them. Please send in a sample review to my e-mail address. Please keep with the formatting of the other reviews on the site. I’ll pick a reviewer fairly quickly, so get your submission in ASAP.
You might be interested in …
Previews: August 15th, 2018
Edge of Spider-Geddon #1 Peter Parker: The Spectacular Spider-Man #308 Spidey: School’s Out #6* Tony Stark: Iron Man #3 (Mary Jane?) *No Preview Available Previews provided by Comic Book Resources
Spidey Still Kicking Butt in 2008
JR has been hard at work updating his website. He’s got opinions on our friendly neighborhood Spider-Man, and he’s sharing them with the ‘net. He is doing some catch up by reviewing Spider-Man in 2006. […]
NYCC 2016 Panels and Guests ( Oct. 6th-9th, 2016) (Update)
New York Comic-Con returns October 6th-9th and will be held at the Javits Center in Midtown Manhattan, located at 655 West 34th Street. (Note: All info below is subject to change) Click For Current New […]
6 Comments
Leave a Reply
Support the Crawlspace on Patreon
Crawlspace Discord
Recent Comments
on Marco Speaks Spidey- Challenges of Doom: Spider-Man #1 Review: ““takes us back years for the previously untold first encounter between Peter Parker and Victor von Doom.” Wait, I thought…” Sep 10, 09:24- on The Top Ten Most Wanted Spider-Man 1967 Figures: “I hope we get more toys from that cartoon.” Sep 8, 19:52
- on Marco Speaks Spidey: What If…? Jessica Jones #1 Review: ““Instead, Jessica’s Spider-Girl career helped make Peter’s career as a reporter.” This is a problem I have with a lot…” Sep 4, 06:03
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #35 (Legacy #999): “Gwen Gone Wild” or “Stroke of Bad Luck”: “@Evan Berry: I am on record as enjoying the Spider-Norman issues much more than the Peter-in-space issues. There was much…” Aug 30, 09:30
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #35 (Legacy #999): “Gwen Gone Wild” or “Stroke of Bad Luck”: “@Hornacek – I sort of zoned out of the space issues of this run and preferred the Spider-Norman issues (which…” Aug 29, 15:57
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #35 (Legacy #999): “Gwen Gone Wild” or “Stroke of Bad Luck”: “@Evan Berry: That plan for Damage Control would make sense only if their original goal was to go after only…” Aug 28, 22:57
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #35 (Legacy #999): “Gwen Gone Wild” or “Stroke of Bad Luck”: “@Hornacek — Another great review! Wow, the second cover of issue #1000 makes it look like Spider-man cares about it…” Aug 28, 08:42
- on Marco Speaks Spidey: Spectacular Spider-Man: Brand New Day #4 Review: “This series just keeps getting better. The balance between Peter’s personal problems and the superhero chaos is working really well.…” Aug 20, 19:31
- on Marco Speaks Spidey: Amazing Spider-Man: Spider-Versity #5 Review: “You left out the best* part – Spider-Woman secretly kept a piece of (the entire?) Carnage symbiote for herself. I’m…” Aug 13, 09:31
@4 – Not sure if Brad’s made a final decision or not. I’d say go ahead and submit one to his email.
@2 – We’ll still be reviewing it. We’ll probably be recording new reviews for USM cartoons either next week or the week after as our personal schedules allow.
Did you guys ever pick a reviewer for the series or can I still work on a submission?
@Hynesj: We generally adhere to a format like this: An opening statement/quote, credits, a brief summary, a section of the review where we post our thoughts (this is generally where we mix things up and should always be the largest segment), and then we end with a verdict and try to give a grade (most of tend to use the A-F grading scale)
What happened to the Ultimate Spider Man reviews because series 3 is a few episodes in.
What do you mean by ‘keep with the formatting of other reviews’ exactly?