Marvel sent me this video showcasing the different battlworlds in the upcoming Secret Wars. What do you think?
You might be interested in …
Spider-News Weekly
Welcome to Spider-News Weekly, let’s see what news has popped up in the last couple of weeks. Quick note, there will be no rumours, theories or anything that can’t be substantiated. Pope Francis meets Spider-Man […]
Morbius in Spider-Man 4?
In a recent interview with Empire Magazine, Spider-Man director Sam Rami hints at a vampire making an apperance in an upcoming movie. Rami says “I like it in the Marvel comics when Spider-Man fights Morbius,” […]
17 Comments
Leave a Reply
Support the Crawlspace on Patreon
Crawlspace Discord
Recent Comments
on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “@Paul Penna: I wouldn’t say I was liking Cormac before the Ravage reveal but his character was … “ok”. I…” Oct 4, 08:59- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “I’m surprised by how much I enjoyed Cormac Crane/Ravage. The story is well written, his powers are interesting and he…” Oct 3, 16:27
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “@Big John: Yeah, an annual is a good comparison. Annuals used to have one big story and 1-2 backups, and…” Oct 2, 22:20
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “This was a glorified Annual with A-List talent on the back-ups. And you know, if it was “only” an Annual,…” Oct 2, 18:09
- on Marco Speaks Spidey: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 – “Ravaged” Review: “When a creative team runs out of meaningful stories to tell about a character’s future, they inevitably start digging up…” Sep 30, 16:11
- on Spider-Variants of the Week 9/30/26: “Who’s getting all the ASM covers? You’d need to take out a loan. Thanks Mohammed for the work you do…” Sep 28, 23:55
- on Marco Speaks Spidey- Challenges of Doom: Spider-Man #1 Review: ““takes us back years for the previously untold first encounter between Peter Parker and Victor von Doom.” Wait, I thought…” Sep 10, 09:24
- on The Top Ten Most Wanted Spider-Man 1967 Figures: “I hope we get more toys from that cartoon.” Sep 8, 19:52
- on Marco Speaks Spidey: What If…? Jessica Jones #1 Review: ““Instead, Jessica’s Spider-Girl career helped make Peter’s career as a reporter.” This is a problem I have with a lot…” Sep 4, 06:03
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #35 (Legacy #999): “Gwen Gone Wild” or “Stroke of Bad Luck”: “@Evan Berry: I am on record as enjoying the Spider-Norman issues much more than the Peter-in-space issues. There was much…” Aug 30, 09:30
@16 Couldn’t tell you. I’ve stopped reading DC comics.
@15 well from what I understand of DC the 70+ years have been retcon through other “crisis” haven’t they?
@14 You mean the 70+ years of history that was erased?
@13 don’t forget flashpoint was planned as a flash only event, and siege as a captain america/Thor event. Everything is possible. Beside I could see marvel use that event to streamline their multiverse by canceling lines that don’t work but bring over popular characters (like the ultimate universe and miles morales) it’d be having your cake and eating it too. It could also be a big reset button for some characters while avoiding the whole “x numbers of years of story never happened” that DC got into
@#12-Very true. However, I think given the fact that it was mainly meant to be an Avengers run, that it might not have the “widespread” ramifications that people are afraid that it will.
True, there will probably be a lot of tie ins, and perhaps it will have a similar impact as something like Original Sin, but I doubt it will lead to a line-wide reboot as so many people suspect.
That’s been reasonably common with a few recent events – Infinity was basically a Hickman Avengers arc, Axis seems to really be a promoted Uncanny Avengers arc. Although Hickman’s known for incredibly detailed planning, so I can believe Marvel have had plenty of time to plot out ramifications.
And in turn, was’nt Hickman’s Avengers stuff just an extension of what he wanted to do in his FF run?
Methinks this was just an Avengers storyarc that Hickman had planned that was elevated up to being a major event, similar to what happened with Secret Invasion and Fear Itself.
You know if Marvel haven’t release events after events, I would’ve been excited for this.
The trailer was cool though.
@ #6 marvel makes that kinda hard…
Oh, wait, there’s *other* publishers!
For a minute there I thought I was playing Risk.
Go find something you DO like.
What If — whatever
Meh to the nth power.
I kinda liked the trailer for this. Interested to see where it goes and how the call-backs to old events fits into everything.
Does Marvel know the meaning of event fatigue?
Meh