J. Scott Campbell has produced a variant for the first issue of Amazing Spider-Man:Renew Your Vows #1. The cover is only available on his website and it’s a beautiful cover, especially for us MJ fans and wedding fans. There are multiple versions of the cover, the cheapest is $24.99 Click here to order it.
You might be interested in …
Two New Pictures from Amazing Spider-Man 2
It seems Einsten and Spidey share a love of a messy room. Also a new picture in the recent issue of Entertainment Weekly show Peter and Harry at a good point in their relationship. The […]
CNN Covers Spider-Streaker
It’s now been reported on CNN. And this Spidey even has a Facebook page.
Jamie Foxx to play Electro?
Sony has confirmed that the villain for Amazing Spider-Man 2 will be Electro, and now Jamie Foxx is in talks to portray the villain. Of course that doesn’t mean it will end up happening, but […]
6 Comments
Comments are closed.
Support the Crawlspace on Patreon
Crawlspace Discord
Recent Comments
on Panel(s) of the Day #1746: “So he’s wearing a mask with another mask over that one? Also, when is the last time we’ve had a…” Oct 17, 06:30- on Spider-Tracer: Boomerang’s 10 Best Costumes: “He also had a different costume in the Spider-Man Lifeline mini series designed by Steve Rude.” Oct 16, 08:54
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “@Paul Penna: I just can’t imagine Cormac/Ravage being left around after this whole thing is resolved, to return periodically to…” Oct 11, 09:35
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “Wow! Poochie came from another planet? “If all he does is use his powers to erase people’s memories to make…” Oct 10, 15:11
- on Marco Speaks Spidey: Midnight Spider-Man #1 Review: “What happened to Aunt May? Is that who Ben was calling?” Oct 10, 00:55
- on Marco Speaks Spidey: Midnight Spider-Man #1 Review: “Don’t forget Uncle Ben’s ongoing lawsuit against Oscorp for the wrongful death of Peter’s parents, and Oscorp’s potential ulterior motive…” Oct 8, 14:53
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “@Paul Penna: “My guess, is that Cormac accidentally used his powers on his mother, accidentally erasing her memories when his…” Oct 7, 11:04
- on Spider-Variants of the Week 10/7/26: “This thing may have more variants than ASM #1000.” Oct 6, 18:48
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “My guess, is that Cormac accidentally used his powers on his mother, accidentally erasing her memories when his powers first…” Oct 6, 11:27
I considered buying it, and stopped for two reasons:
1) I don’t have the extra money to buy this incredible variant.
2) It’s a Quesada tactic to say “Never mind, Spider-Fans! The marriage exists! Now, please stop filing lawsuits against me and Dan Slott.” As much as I love this, and the marriage in general, I’m still not on for RYV. If you’ll excuse, I’m gonna rant on YouTube about this.
Beautiful cover, but I don’t buy variants either and I’m certainly not wasting that kind of money on Slott’s writing.
It’s an amazing cover. But I don’t have the .
See, I didn’t want to buy the issue until I read reviews to see if slott’s writing was any good. Now I want to buy it solely for that cover!
I don’t buy variants, but good lord Campbell draws a damn fine MJ.
I considered it, until I saw the price tag. Pass.