What a story that’ll be!
Amazing Spider-Man Annual (Vol. 1) #1
Published: c. 1964?
Cover Date: 1964
“The Sinister Six!”
Writer: Stan Lee
Artist: Steve Ditko
Inker: Steve Ditko
Letterer: Sam Rosen
Panel of the Day #588 (Splash Page Sunday!)
You might be interested in …
Panel(s) of the Day #1674 (Ditko!)
Famous last words. Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #1 Published: c. January, 1963? Cover Date: March, 1963 “Spider-Man” Writer: Stan Lee Artist: Steve Ditko Inker: Steve Ditko Letterer: Jon D’Agostino
Panel of the Day #303 (Splash Page Sunday!)
I think this is my favorite of all the different armors Spidey’s worn over the years. You can’t really beat the original. Web of Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #100 Published: c. March, 1993? Cover Date: May, […]
Panel of the Day #1096 (Splash Page Sunday: Mother’s Day!)
It was a long time coming! Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 2) #38 Published: c. December, 2001? Cover Date: February, 2002 “The Conversation” Writer: J. Michael Straczynski Artist: John Romita Jr. Inker: Scott Hanna Letterer: Richard Starkings […]
2 Comments
Leave a Reply
Support the Crawlspace on Patreon
Crawlspace Discord
Recent Comments
on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “@Paul Penna: I wouldn’t say I was liking Cormac before the Ravage reveal but his character was … “ok”. I…” Oct 4, 08:59- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “I’m surprised by how much I enjoyed Cormac Crane/Ravage. The story is well written, his powers are interesting and he…” Oct 3, 16:27
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “@Big John: Yeah, an annual is a good comparison. Annuals used to have one big story and 1-2 backups, and…” Oct 2, 22:20
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “This was a glorified Annual with A-List talent on the back-ups. And you know, if it was “only” an Annual,…” Oct 2, 18:09
- on Marco Speaks Spidey: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 – “Ravaged” Review: “When a creative team runs out of meaningful stories to tell about a character’s future, they inevitably start digging up…” Sep 30, 16:11
- on Spider-Variants of the Week 9/30/26: “Who’s getting all the ASM covers? You’d need to take out a loan. Thanks Mohammed for the work you do…” Sep 28, 23:55
- on Marco Speaks Spidey- Challenges of Doom: Spider-Man #1 Review: ““takes us back years for the previously untold first encounter between Peter Parker and Victor von Doom.” Wait, I thought…” Sep 10, 09:24
- on The Top Ten Most Wanted Spider-Man 1967 Figures: “I hope we get more toys from that cartoon.” Sep 8, 19:52
- on Marco Speaks Spidey: What If…? Jessica Jones #1 Review: ““Instead, Jessica’s Spider-Girl career helped make Peter’s career as a reporter.” This is a problem I have with a lot…” Sep 4, 06:03
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #35 (Legacy #999): “Gwen Gone Wild” or “Stroke of Bad Luck”: “@Evan Berry: I am on record as enjoying the Spider-Norman issues much more than the Peter-in-space issues. There was much…” Aug 30, 09:30
@hornacek: Most of them. I haven’t posted the Vulture and Sandman ones yet.
Have all 6 of the villain splash pages from this annual been done in this series? Because they all should be.