Thank dog for flexible cables.
Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #48
Published: c. March, 1967?
Cover Date: May, 1967
“The Wings of the Vulture!”
Writer: Stan Lee
Artist: John Romita
Inker: John Romita
Letterer: Sam Rosen
Panel of the Day #780
You might be interested in …
Panel of the Day #1237 (Splash Page Sunday!)
It’s a new year, but the origin is looking a little different this time. Sensational Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #0 Published: c. November, 1995? Cover Date: January, 1996 “Ultimate Commitment” Writer: Dan Jurgens Artist: Dan Jurgens […]
Panel(s) of the Day #1258 (Mary Jane Monday!)
Aunt May is a little bit country and a little bit rock and roll. Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #160 Published: c. June, 1976? Cover Date: September, 1976 “My Killer, the Car!” Writer: Len Wein Artist: […]
Panel of the Day #880 (Splash Page Sunday!)
Mary Jane might as well reveal that she knows since Peter probably wasn’t going to tell her. Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #258 Published: c. August, 1984? Cover Date: November, 1984 “The Sinister Secret of Spider-Man’s […]
2 Comments
Leave a Reply
Support the Crawlspace on Patreon
Crawlspace Discord
Recent Comments
on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “@Paul Penna: I wouldn’t say I was liking Cormac before the Ravage reveal but his character was … “ok”. I…” Oct 4, 08:59- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “I’m surprised by how much I enjoyed Cormac Crane/Ravage. The story is well written, his powers are interesting and he…” Oct 3, 16:27
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “@Big John: Yeah, an annual is a good comparison. Annuals used to have one big story and 1-2 backups, and…” Oct 2, 22:20
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “This was a glorified Annual with A-List talent on the back-ups. And you know, if it was “only” an Annual,…” Oct 2, 18:09
- on Marco Speaks Spidey: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 – “Ravaged” Review: “When a creative team runs out of meaningful stories to tell about a character’s future, they inevitably start digging up…” Sep 30, 16:11
- on Spider-Variants of the Week 9/30/26: “Who’s getting all the ASM covers? You’d need to take out a loan. Thanks Mohammed for the work you do…” Sep 28, 23:55
- on Marco Speaks Spidey- Challenges of Doom: Spider-Man #1 Review: ““takes us back years for the previously untold first encounter between Peter Parker and Victor von Doom.” Wait, I thought…” Sep 10, 09:24
- on The Top Ten Most Wanted Spider-Man 1967 Figures: “I hope we get more toys from that cartoon.” Sep 8, 19:52
- on Marco Speaks Spidey: What If…? Jessica Jones #1 Review: ““Instead, Jessica’s Spider-Girl career helped make Peter’s career as a reporter.” This is a problem I have with a lot…” Sep 4, 06:03
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #35 (Legacy #999): “Gwen Gone Wild” or “Stroke of Bad Luck”: “@Evan Berry: I am on record as enjoying the Spider-Norman issues much more than the Peter-in-space issues. There was much…” Aug 30, 09:30
@Evan: It’s a nice and rubbery-sounding one.
That’s some nice onomatopoeia right there! I love how the issues from the 60s always describe in minute detail what’s happening in each panel.