What was Sandman thinking?
Amazing Spider-Man Annual (Vol. 1) #1
Published: c. 1964?
Cover Date: 1964
“The Sinister Six!”
Writer: Stan Lee
Artist: Steve Ditko
Inker: Steve Ditko
Letterer: Sam Rosen
Panel of the Day #792 (Splash Page Sunday!)
You might be interested in …
Panel(s) of the Day #991
Just in case. Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 2) #55 Published: c. July, 2003? Cover Date: September, 2003 “Unintended Consequences” Plot: J. Michael Straczynski and Fiona Avery Script: Fiona Avery Artist: John Romita Jr. Inker: Scott Hanna […]
Panel(s) of the Day #1409 (Mary Jane Monday!)
Mary Jane is absolutely ruthless. Web of Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #36 Published: c. December, 1987? Cover Date: March, 1988 “Phreak-Out!” Writer: Gerry Conway Artist: Alex Saviuk Inker: Keith Williams Letterer: Rick Parker Colorist: Janet Jackson
Panel(s) of the Day #822
Glad that got cleared up. Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #80 Published: c. November, 1969? Cover Date: January, 1970 “On the Trail of… The Chameleon!” Writer: Stan Lee Artist: John Buscema, Jim Mooney, and John Romita […]
1 Comment
Leave a Reply
Support the Crawlspace on Patreon
Crawlspace Discord
Recent Comments
on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “@Paul Penna: I wouldn’t say I was liking Cormac before the Ravage reveal but his character was … “ok”. I…” Oct 4, 08:59- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “I’m surprised by how much I enjoyed Cormac Crane/Ravage. The story is well written, his powers are interesting and he…” Oct 3, 16:27
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “@Big John: Yeah, an annual is a good comparison. Annuals used to have one big story and 1-2 backups, and…” Oct 2, 22:20
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “This was a glorified Annual with A-List talent on the back-ups. And you know, if it was “only” an Annual,…” Oct 2, 18:09
- on Marco Speaks Spidey: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 – “Ravaged” Review: “When a creative team runs out of meaningful stories to tell about a character’s future, they inevitably start digging up…” Sep 30, 16:11
- on Spider-Variants of the Week 9/30/26: “Who’s getting all the ASM covers? You’d need to take out a loan. Thanks Mohammed for the work you do…” Sep 28, 23:55
- on Marco Speaks Spidey- Challenges of Doom: Spider-Man #1 Review: ““takes us back years for the previously untold first encounter between Peter Parker and Victor von Doom.” Wait, I thought…” Sep 10, 09:24
- on The Top Ten Most Wanted Spider-Man 1967 Figures: “I hope we get more toys from that cartoon.” Sep 8, 19:52
- on Marco Speaks Spidey: What If…? Jessica Jones #1 Review: ““Instead, Jessica’s Spider-Girl career helped make Peter’s career as a reporter.” This is a problem I have with a lot…” Sep 4, 06:03
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #35 (Legacy #999): “Gwen Gone Wild” or “Stroke of Bad Luck”: “@Evan Berry: I am on record as enjoying the Spider-Norman issues much more than the Peter-in-space issues. There was much…” Aug 30, 09:30
That’s a lot of exposition to get out in the span of one punch! I love these one-panel pages we got in the annual of Spidey fighting the Sinister Six, some of the best work Ditko ever did.