Dang, Peter ain’t holding back.
Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #91
Published: c. October, 1970?
Cover Date: December, 1970
“To Smash the Spider!”
Writer: Stan Lee
Artist: Gil Kane
Inker: John Romita
Letterer: Sam Rosen
Panel(s) of the Day #845
You might be interested in …
Panel of the Day #1684 (Splash Page Sunday!)
My sources are telling me that a new Superman movie just came out. Superman vs. the Amazing Spider-Man Published: c. 1976Cover Date: 1976 “The Battle of the Century! Chapter 2: When Heroes Clash!”Writer: Gerry ConwayArtist: […]
Panel(s) of the Day #270
You never know, seeing Peter unmask might have made things worse! Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #54 Published: c. September, 1967? Cover Date: November, 1967 “The Tentacles and the Trap!” Writer: Stan Lee Artist: John Romita […]
Panel of the Day #422 (Splash Page Sunday!)
Kraven just can’t seem to stay dead! Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #111 Published: c. May, 1972? Cover Date: August, 1972 “To Stalk a Spider!” Writer: Gerry Conway Artist: John Romita Inker: John Romita Letterer: John […]
2 Comments
Leave a Reply
Support the Crawlspace on Patreon
Crawlspace Discord
Recent Comments
on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “@Paul Penna: I wouldn’t say I was liking Cormac before the Ravage reveal but his character was … “ok”. I…” Oct 4, 08:59- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “I’m surprised by how much I enjoyed Cormac Crane/Ravage. The story is well written, his powers are interesting and he…” Oct 3, 16:27
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “@Big John: Yeah, an annual is a good comparison. Annuals used to have one big story and 1-2 backups, and…” Oct 2, 22:20
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “This was a glorified Annual with A-List talent on the back-ups. And you know, if it was “only” an Annual,…” Oct 2, 18:09
- on Marco Speaks Spidey: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 – “Ravaged” Review: “When a creative team runs out of meaningful stories to tell about a character’s future, they inevitably start digging up…” Sep 30, 16:11
- on Spider-Variants of the Week 9/30/26: “Who’s getting all the ASM covers? You’d need to take out a loan. Thanks Mohammed for the work you do…” Sep 28, 23:55
- on Marco Speaks Spidey- Challenges of Doom: Spider-Man #1 Review: ““takes us back years for the previously untold first encounter between Peter Parker and Victor von Doom.” Wait, I thought…” Sep 10, 09:24
- on The Top Ten Most Wanted Spider-Man 1967 Figures: “I hope we get more toys from that cartoon.” Sep 8, 19:52
- on Marco Speaks Spidey: What If…? Jessica Jones #1 Review: ““Instead, Jessica’s Spider-Girl career helped make Peter’s career as a reporter.” This is a problem I have with a lot…” Sep 4, 06:03
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #35 (Legacy #999): “Gwen Gone Wild” or “Stroke of Bad Luck”: “@Evan Berry: I am on record as enjoying the Spider-Norman issues much more than the Peter-in-space issues. There was much…” Aug 30, 09:30
I remember really enjoying this storyline, Spidey taking on a corrupt politician is really compelling. It’s a great example of the comic getting political without being obnoxious about it.
Uh-oh. Peter went straight for the Hitler analogy. That was old even in 1970.