The more things change…
Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #92
Published: c. October, 1970?
Cover Date: January, 1971
“When Iceman Attacks”
Writer: Stan Lee
Artist: Gil Kane
Inker: John Romita
Letterer: Artie Simek
Panel of the Day #924
You might be interested in …
Panel of the Day #1056 (Splash Page Sunday!)
Sounds about right! Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #136 Published: c. July, 1974? Cover Date: September, 1974 “The Green Goblin Lives Again!” Writer: Gerry Conway Artist: Ross Andru Inker: Frank Giacoia and Dave Hunt Letterer: Artie […]
Panel of the Day #76 (Ditko!)
Then it was revealed that Betty was just dreaming. Peter’s secret is still safe (for now)! Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #34 Published: c. January, 1966? Cover Date: March, 1966 “The Thrill of the Hunt!” Plot: […]
Panel of the Day #1581
Almost sounds a little too good to be true. What’s the catch? Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #220 Published: c. June, 1981? Cover Date: September, 1981 “A Coffin for Spider-Man!” Writer: Michael Fleisher Artist: Bob McLeod […]
4 Comments
Leave a Reply
Support the Crawlspace on Patreon
Crawlspace Discord
Recent Comments
on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “Wow! Poochie came from another planet? “If all he does is use his powers to erase people’s memories to make…” Oct 10, 15:11- on Marco Speaks Spidey: Midnight Spider-Man #1 Review: “What happened to Aunt May? Is that who Ben was calling?” Oct 10, 00:55
- on Marco Speaks Spidey: Midnight Spider-Man #1 Review: “Don’t forget Uncle Ben’s ongoing lawsuit against Oscorp for the wrongful death of Peter’s parents, and Oscorp’s potential ulterior motive…” Oct 8, 14:53
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “@Paul Penna: “My guess, is that Cormac accidentally used his powers on his mother, accidentally erasing her memories when his…” Oct 7, 11:04
- on Spider-Variants of the Week 10/7/26: “This thing may have more variants than ASM #1000.” Oct 6, 18:48
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “My guess, is that Cormac accidentally used his powers on his mother, accidentally erasing her memories when his powers first…” Oct 6, 11:27
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “@Paul Penna: I wouldn’t say I was liking Cormac before the Ravage reveal but his character was … “ok”. I…” Oct 4, 08:59
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “I’m surprised by how much I enjoyed Cormac Crane/Ravage. The story is well written, his powers are interesting and he…” Oct 3, 16:27
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “@Big John: Yeah, an annual is a good comparison. Annuals used to have one big story and 1-2 backups, and…” Oct 2, 22:20
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “This was a glorified Annual with A-List talent on the back-ups. And you know, if it was “only” an Annual,…” Oct 2, 18:09
Shiiieeeeeeet…
@honacek — Bongbong! Bongbong! <—— OOTI
TV Producer Dick Wolf read this issue as a child and this panel inspired the rest of his life.
Having the “camera” shooting up from under Bullitt really sells the threat. That’s some great composition.
(Also, that “Bullitt”/”shooting” pun was completely unintentional, I promise.)