Electro is a simple man with simple desires. Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #82 Published: c. January, 1970? Cover Date: March, 1970 “And Then Came Electro!” Writer: Stan Lee Artist: John Romita Inker: Jim Mooney Letterer: […]
Wild stuff happening soon! Sensational Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #0 Published: c. November, 1995? Cover Date: January, 1996 “Ultimate Commitment” Writer: Dan Jurgens Artist: Dan Jurgens Inker: Klaus Janson Letterer: Richard Starkings and Comicraft Colorist: Gregory […]
It’s cool that they took the time to explain how all this stuff might actually work. Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #13 Published: c. April, 1964? Cover Date: June, 1964 “The Menace of… Mysterio!” Writer: Stan […]
on Panel of the Day #1549 (Splash Page Sunday!): ““Fitzgerald Grapes” That has to be a reference to someone, right?” May 5, 14:46 on Panel(s) of the Day #1548: “And tomorrow it’ll be the 17th anniversary of the release of Spider-man 3.” May 3, 10:47 on The Chi✶Town Breakdown: USM #4 (2024): “I loved the issue – one thing that stuck out to me was how oily MJs hair looked in the…” May 2, 15:42 on The Chi✶Town Breakdown: USM #4 (2024): “@Evan – I went back and saw the “stain”. To me it just looks like a shadow or smudge -…” May 1, 15:58 on The Chi✶Town Breakdown: USM #4 (2024): “@Chi-Town — It’s probably just a design choice, and I’m thinking too hard. 😀” May 1, 15:55 on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #48 (Legacy #942): “The Doctor Will See You Now” or “The (Henry) Winkler Device Returns”: “*checks in* Yep, ASM still sucks…I’m glad Hornacek is covering reviews, otherwise we have to listen to Mark wine.” May 1, 15:04 on The Chi✶Town Breakdown: USM #4 (2024): “Hornacek: Who do you think TAUGHT that to Mark? That’s why he calls me his “best friend”. Evan: Honestly, never…” May 1, 15:00 on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #46 (Legacy #940): “The Ravencroft Redemption” or “Anna Watson, Villain Rehabilitator”: “@Evan Berry: A two-parter makes more sense – a 1980s sitcom would not likely have a subplot going on for…” May 1, 13:49 on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #48 (Legacy #942): “The Doctor Will See You Now” or “The (Henry) Winkler Device Returns”: “@Aqu@: “IMO, the ‘behind the scene’ bit was in bad taste; it’s also unnecessary, since actions tell more than words.…” May 1, 13:42 on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #48 (Legacy #942): “The Doctor Will See You Now” or “The (Henry) Winkler Device Returns”: “IMO, the “behind the scene” bit was in bad taste; it’s also unnecessary, since actions tell more than words. It…” May 1, 11:55
Apple Podcasts
Google Podcasts
Spotify
Pandora
Amazon Music
iHeartRadio
Podbean
Amazon Alexa
Player.fm
Listen Notes
Stitcher
I meant a funeral pyre, like Luke did to Vader at the end of Return of the Jedi.
@hornacek cutting off the head would work. Burning the body wouldn’t (as we saw when he survived the bag of goblin bombs in PP:SM #75).
Spidey should have burned the body here, or cut off his head. Just to be sure.
And Conway was only 19 or 20 when he wrote this.