Sometimes it’s hard to be a super hero!
Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #15
Published: c. June, 1964?
Cover Date: August, 1964
“Kraven the Hunter!”
Writer: Stan Lee
Artist: Steve Ditko
Inker: Steve Ditko
Letterer: Artie Simek
You might be interested in …
Panel(s) of the Day #306 (Ditko!)
Scorpion’s got an excellent sneer going on here. Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #29 Published: c. August, 1965?Cover Date: October, 1965 “Never Step on a Scorpion!”Plot: Steve DitkoScript: Stan LeeArtist: Steve DitkoInker: Steve DitkoLetterer: Sam Rosen
Panel of the Day #721
It’s been nearly 30 years, but he’s back! Web of Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #70 Published: c. September, 1990? Cover Date: November, 1990 “A Hulk by Any Other Name…” Plot: Gerry Conway Script: David Michelinie Artist: […]
Panel(s) of the Day #281 (Caturday!)
That impressive feat is all thanks to Black Cat’s training! Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #194 Published: c. April, 1979? Cover Date: July, 1979 “Never Let the Black Cat Cross Your Path!” Writer: Marv Wolfman Artist: Keith […]
6 Comments
Leave a Reply
Support the Crawlspace on Patreon
Crawlspace Discord
Recent Comments
on Marco Speaks Spidey- Challenges of Doom: Spider-Man #1 Review: ““takes us back years for the previously untold first encounter between Peter Parker and Victor von Doom.” Wait, I thought…” Sep 10, 09:24- on The Top Ten Most Wanted Spider-Man 1967 Figures: “I hope we get more toys from that cartoon.” Sep 8, 19:52
- on Marco Speaks Spidey: What If…? Jessica Jones #1 Review: ““Instead, Jessica’s Spider-Girl career helped make Peter’s career as a reporter.” This is a problem I have with a lot…” Sep 4, 06:03
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #35 (Legacy #999): “Gwen Gone Wild” or “Stroke of Bad Luck”: “@Evan Berry: I am on record as enjoying the Spider-Norman issues much more than the Peter-in-space issues. There was much…” Aug 30, 09:30
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #35 (Legacy #999): “Gwen Gone Wild” or “Stroke of Bad Luck”: “@Hornacek – I sort of zoned out of the space issues of this run and preferred the Spider-Norman issues (which…” Aug 29, 15:57
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #35 (Legacy #999): “Gwen Gone Wild” or “Stroke of Bad Luck”: “@Evan Berry: That plan for Damage Control would make sense only if their original goal was to go after only…” Aug 28, 22:57
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #35 (Legacy #999): “Gwen Gone Wild” or “Stroke of Bad Luck”: “@Hornacek — Another great review! Wow, the second cover of issue #1000 makes it look like Spider-man cares about it…” Aug 28, 08:42
- on Marco Speaks Spidey: Spectacular Spider-Man: Brand New Day #4 Review: “This series just keeps getting better. The balance between Peter’s personal problems and the superhero chaos is working really well.…” Aug 20, 19:31
- on Marco Speaks Spidey: Amazing Spider-Man: Spider-Versity #5 Review: “You left out the best* part – Spider-Woman secretly kept a piece of (the entire?) Carnage symbiote for herself. I’m…” Aug 13, 09:31
@hornacek — Well, it would have (a) if there were no typos, and (b) if I could do simple arithmetic today.
@hornacek — That makes sense. I see there’s a three-hour difference between your post and the time displayed, as well. Right now it’s 11:2r AM by my watch. I suppose this will display as 2:2r PM.
@Evan – Maybe it uses the timzeone where the site’s server is stored? I’m posting this comment at 7:06pm local time.
Also, I’ve always wondered why the time stamp on my comments — from my perspective, at least — is always four hours in the future.
I would think the hunt would be that much more interesting if Kraven knew nothing about his quarry.
I love the “Move it, bub! You’re blockin’ progress!” line. This guy doesn’t give an F about anything.