I agree with Peter.
Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #265
Published: c. March, 1985?
Cover Date: June, 1985
“After the Fox!”
Writer: Tom DeFalco
Artist: Ron Frenz
Inker: Joe Rubinstein
Letterer: Phil Felix
Colorist: Bob Sharen
You might be interested in …
Panel(s) of the Day #1691 (Mary Jane Monday!)
This is a nice moment, but what really impresses me is the length of Mary Jane’s hair here. Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #306 Published: c. July, 1988?Cover Date: October, 1988 “Humbugged!”Writer: David MichelinieArtist: Todd McFarlaneInker: […]
Panel(s) of the Day #1266
Surely these two can figure out Spidey’s true identity! 🕵️♂️ Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #76 Published: c. July, 1969? Cover Date: September, 1969 “The Lizard Lives!” Writer: Stan Lee Artist: John Buscema Inker: Jim Mooney […]
Panel(s) of the Day #1428
How considerate of Stan. Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #99 Published: c. May, 1971? Cover Date: August, 1971 “A Day in the Life Of –” Writer: Stan Lee Artist: Gil Kane Inker: Frank Giacoia Letterer: Artie […]
2 Comments
Leave a Reply
Support the Crawlspace on Patreon
Crawlspace Discord
Recent Comments
on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “@Paul Penna: I wouldn’t say I was liking Cormac before the Ravage reveal but his character was … “ok”. I…” Oct 4, 08:59- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “I’m surprised by how much I enjoyed Cormac Crane/Ravage. The story is well written, his powers are interesting and he…” Oct 3, 16:27
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “@Big John: Yeah, an annual is a good comparison. Annuals used to have one big story and 1-2 backups, and…” Oct 2, 22:20
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “This was a glorified Annual with A-List talent on the back-ups. And you know, if it was “only” an Annual,…” Oct 2, 18:09
- on Marco Speaks Spidey: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 – “Ravaged” Review: “When a creative team runs out of meaningful stories to tell about a character’s future, they inevitably start digging up…” Sep 30, 16:11
- on Spider-Variants of the Week 9/30/26: “Who’s getting all the ASM covers? You’d need to take out a loan. Thanks Mohammed for the work you do…” Sep 28, 23:55
- on Marco Speaks Spidey- Challenges of Doom: Spider-Man #1 Review: ““takes us back years for the previously untold first encounter between Peter Parker and Victor von Doom.” Wait, I thought…” Sep 10, 09:24
- on The Top Ten Most Wanted Spider-Man 1967 Figures: “I hope we get more toys from that cartoon.” Sep 8, 19:52
- on Marco Speaks Spidey: What If…? Jessica Jones #1 Review: ““Instead, Jessica’s Spider-Girl career helped make Peter’s career as a reporter.” This is a problem I have with a lot…” Sep 4, 06:03
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #35 (Legacy #999): “Gwen Gone Wild” or “Stroke of Bad Luck”: “@Evan Berry: I am on record as enjoying the Spider-Norman issues much more than the Peter-in-space issues. There was much…” Aug 30, 09:30
I must admit that, even before the pandemic, within the last ten years I’ve only ever seen new fathers let others hold their children if they’ve used hand sanitizer first. Maybe Harry is just super excited because Back to the Future is going to be released in the next month.
To quote Peter’s favourite lady, “I love babies…other peoples’ of course”