Same Spider-Time, same Spider-Channel!
Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #106
Published: c. December, 1971?
Cover Date: March, 1972
“Squash! Goes the Spider!”
Writer: Stan Lee
Artist: John Romita
Inker: Frank Giacoia
Letterer: Sam Rosen
You might be interested in …
Panel of the Day #790
All these years later and they’re still going strong! (Sort of!) Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #280 Published: c. June, 1986? Cover Date: September, 1986 “The Sinister Syndicate!” Writer: Tom DeFalco Artist: Ron Frenz and Brett […]
Panel(s) of the Day #164 (Mary Jane Monday!)
Redheads, can we really trust them? Marvel Team-Up (Vol. 1) #20 Published: c. January, 1974? Cover Date: April, 1974 “Dinosaurs on Broadway!” Writer: Len Wein Artist: Sal Buscema Inker: Frank Giacoia and Mike Esposito Letterer: […]
Panel(s) of the Day #736 (Caturday!)
Those poor saps. Peter Parker, the Spectacular Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #100 Published: c. December, 1984? Cover Date: March, 1985 “Breakin’!” Writer: Al Milgrom Artist: Al Milgrom Inker: Geof Isherwood Letterer: Diana Albers Colorist: Bob Sharen
1 Comment
Leave a Reply
Support the Crawlspace on Patreon
Crawlspace Discord
Recent Comments
on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “@Paul Penna: “My guess, is that Cormac accidentally used his powers on his mother, accidentally erasing her memories when his…” Oct 7, 11:04- on Spider-Variants of the Week 10/7/26: “This thing may have more variants than ASM #1000.” Oct 6, 18:48
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “My guess, is that Cormac accidentally used his powers on his mother, accidentally erasing her memories when his powers first…” Oct 6, 11:27
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “@Paul Penna: I wouldn’t say I was liking Cormac before the Ravage reveal but his character was … “ok”. I…” Oct 4, 08:59
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “I’m surprised by how much I enjoyed Cormac Crane/Ravage. The story is well written, his powers are interesting and he…” Oct 3, 16:27
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “@Big John: Yeah, an annual is a good comparison. Annuals used to have one big story and 1-2 backups, and…” Oct 2, 22:20
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “This was a glorified Annual with A-List talent on the back-ups. And you know, if it was “only” an Annual,…” Oct 2, 18:09
- on Marco Speaks Spidey: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 – “Ravaged” Review: “When a creative team runs out of meaningful stories to tell about a character’s future, they inevitably start digging up…” Sep 30, 16:11
- on Spider-Variants of the Week 9/30/26: “Who’s getting all the ASM covers? You’d need to take out a loan. Thanks Mohammed for the work you do…” Sep 28, 23:55
- on Marco Speaks Spidey- Challenges of Doom: Spider-Man #1 Review: ““takes us back years for the previously untold first encounter between Peter Parker and Victor von Doom.” Wait, I thought…” Sep 10, 09:24
I always thought Slott’s whole “Superior” Spider-Man terminology was unique at the time, and yet I keep seeing panels from much earlier stories where someone else claims to be a “superior” version of Spidey.