Will this movie ever come out?
Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #102
Published: c. August, 1971?
Cover Date: November, 1971
“Vampire at Large! Part 2: — The Way It Began”
Writer: Roy Thomas
Artist: Gil Kane
Inker: Frank Giacoia
Letterer: Artie Simek
You might be interested in …
Panel(s) of the Day #976 (Ditko!)
A mystery that is only just beginning! Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #14 Published: c. May, 1964? Cover Date: July, 1964 “The Grotesque Adventure of the Green Goblin” Writer: Stan Lee Artist: Steve Ditko Inker: Steve […]
Panel(s) of the Day #1244
Maybe this Spidey guy isn’t so bad after all. Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #96 Published: c. February, 1971? Cover Date: May, 1971 “– And Now, the Goblin!” Writer: Stan Lee Artist: Gil Kane Inker: John […]
Panel of the Day #531 (Caturday!)
I think I understand. Black Cat (Vol. 1) #2 Published: July 10, 2019 Cover Date: September, 2019 “Holiest of Holies, Part 1” Writer: Jed MacKay Artist: Travel Foreman Inker: Travel Foreman Letterer: Ferran Delgado Colorist: […]
3 Comments
Leave a Reply
Support the Crawlspace on Patreon
Crawlspace Discord
Recent Comments
on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “@Paul Penna: I wouldn’t say I was liking Cormac before the Ravage reveal but his character was … “ok”. I…” Oct 4, 08:59- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “I’m surprised by how much I enjoyed Cormac Crane/Ravage. The story is well written, his powers are interesting and he…” Oct 3, 16:27
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “@Big John: Yeah, an annual is a good comparison. Annuals used to have one big story and 1-2 backups, and…” Oct 2, 22:20
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “This was a glorified Annual with A-List talent on the back-ups. And you know, if it was “only” an Annual,…” Oct 2, 18:09
- on Marco Speaks Spidey: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 – “Ravaged” Review: “When a creative team runs out of meaningful stories to tell about a character’s future, they inevitably start digging up…” Sep 30, 16:11
- on Spider-Variants of the Week 9/30/26: “Who’s getting all the ASM covers? You’d need to take out a loan. Thanks Mohammed for the work you do…” Sep 28, 23:55
- on Marco Speaks Spidey- Challenges of Doom: Spider-Man #1 Review: ““takes us back years for the previously untold first encounter between Peter Parker and Victor von Doom.” Wait, I thought…” Sep 10, 09:24
- on The Top Ten Most Wanted Spider-Man 1967 Figures: “I hope we get more toys from that cartoon.” Sep 8, 19:52
- on Marco Speaks Spidey: What If…? Jessica Jones #1 Review: ““Instead, Jessica’s Spider-Girl career helped make Peter’s career as a reporter.” This is a problem I have with a lot…” Sep 4, 06:03
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #35 (Legacy #999): “Gwen Gone Wild” or “Stroke of Bad Luck”: “@Evan Berry: I am on record as enjoying the Spider-Norman issues much more than the Peter-in-space issues. There was much…” Aug 30, 09:30
Was this #100-102 Six arm/Morbius story any good?
@hornacek — As I read that, I heard it in Morbius’s voice from the 90s cartoon. I watched an episode of Batman: The Animated Series this weekend (“Fountain of Youth”), and Batman used the word “plasma” instead of “blood.” It made me think of cartoon Morbius and his weird suction cup hands.
“Fe-liiiiiiii-sha!”