‘Nuff said!
Spectacular Spider-Man Magazine (Vol. 1) #2
Published: c. September, 1968?
Cover Date: November, 1968
“The Goblin Lives!”
Writer: Stan Lee
Artist: John Romita
Inker: Jim Mooney
Letterer: Sam Rosen
You might be interested in …
Panel(s) of the Day #79 (Caturday!)
I’m sure there are worse ways to spend an hour! Peter Parker, the Spectacular Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #92 Published: c. April, 1984? Cover Date: July, 1984 “And the Answer Is…” Writer: Al Milgrom Artist: Al […]
Panel of the Day #893 (Splash Page Sunday!)
“It may just change your mind!” — Sometimes it’s good to try something different. Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #27 Published: c. June, 1965? Cover Date: August, 1965 “Bring Back My Goblin to Me!” Plot: Steve […]
Panel of the Day #394 (Splash Page Sunday!)
Peter’s realization in this issue was probably a good enough answer at the time. Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #150 Published: c. August, 1975? Cover Date: November, 1975 “Spider-Man… Or Spider-Clone?” Writer: Archie Goodwin Artist: Gil […]
4 Comments
Leave a Reply
Support the Crawlspace on Patreon
Crawlspace Discord
Recent Comments
on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “@Paul Penna: I wouldn’t say I was liking Cormac before the Ravage reveal but his character was … “ok”. I…” Oct 4, 08:59- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “I’m surprised by how much I enjoyed Cormac Crane/Ravage. The story is well written, his powers are interesting and he…” Oct 3, 16:27
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “@Big John: Yeah, an annual is a good comparison. Annuals used to have one big story and 1-2 backups, and…” Oct 2, 22:20
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “This was a glorified Annual with A-List talent on the back-ups. And you know, if it was “only” an Annual,…” Oct 2, 18:09
- on Marco Speaks Spidey: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 – “Ravaged” Review: “When a creative team runs out of meaningful stories to tell about a character’s future, they inevitably start digging up…” Sep 30, 16:11
- on Spider-Variants of the Week 9/30/26: “Who’s getting all the ASM covers? You’d need to take out a loan. Thanks Mohammed for the work you do…” Sep 28, 23:55
- on Marco Speaks Spidey- Challenges of Doom: Spider-Man #1 Review: ““takes us back years for the previously untold first encounter between Peter Parker and Victor von Doom.” Wait, I thought…” Sep 10, 09:24
- on The Top Ten Most Wanted Spider-Man 1967 Figures: “I hope we get more toys from that cartoon.” Sep 8, 19:52
- on Marco Speaks Spidey: What If…? Jessica Jones #1 Review: ““Instead, Jessica’s Spider-Girl career helped make Peter’s career as a reporter.” This is a problem I have with a lot…” Sep 4, 06:03
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #35 (Legacy #999): “Gwen Gone Wild” or “Stroke of Bad Luck”: “@Evan Berry: I am on record as enjoying the Spider-Norman issues much more than the Peter-in-space issues. There was much…” Aug 30, 09:30
To this day, this panel scares me.
Never been a great fan of Mooney’s inks, but here, he nails it.
I imagine this is what happens to JR every night.
This panel could have been the splash page for Peter Parker Spider-Man #75 (or the last page of the ASM issue right before it).
Not subtle with the coloring, is he?