How about that No Way Home trailer?
Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #112
Published: c. June, 1972?
Cover Date: September, 1972
“Spidey Cops Out!”
Writer: Gerry Conway
Artist: John Romita
Inker: John Romita
Letterer: Artie Simek
You might be interested in …
Panel(s) of the Day #569
Always be aware of your surroundings. Peter Parker, the Spectacular Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #11 Published: c. July, 1977? Cover Date: October, 1977 “A Life Too Far” Writer: Chris Claremont Artist: Jim Mooney Inker: Mike Esposito […]
Panel(s) of the Day #1587 (Ditko!)
Never doubt ol’ Spidey’s fortitude. Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #5 Published: c. August, 1963? Cover Date: October, 1963 “Marked for Destruction by Dr. Doom!” Writer: Stan Lee Artist: Steve Ditko Inker: Steve Ditko Letterer: Sam […]
Panel(s) of the Day #786 (Mary Jane Monday!)
Aunt May and Aunt Anna are the real master planners. Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #43 Published: c. October, 1966? Cover Date: December, 1966 “Rhino on the Rampage!” Writer: Stan Lee Artist: John Romita Inker: John […]
2 Comments
Leave a Reply
Support the Crawlspace on Patreon
Crawlspace Discord
Recent Comments
on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “@Paul Penna: I wouldn’t say I was liking Cormac before the Ravage reveal but his character was … “ok”. I…” Oct 4, 08:59- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “I’m surprised by how much I enjoyed Cormac Crane/Ravage. The story is well written, his powers are interesting and he…” Oct 3, 16:27
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “@Big John: Yeah, an annual is a good comparison. Annuals used to have one big story and 1-2 backups, and…” Oct 2, 22:20
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “This was a glorified Annual with A-List talent on the back-ups. And you know, if it was “only” an Annual,…” Oct 2, 18:09
- on Marco Speaks Spidey: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 – “Ravaged” Review: “When a creative team runs out of meaningful stories to tell about a character’s future, they inevitably start digging up…” Sep 30, 16:11
- on Spider-Variants of the Week 9/30/26: “Who’s getting all the ASM covers? You’d need to take out a loan. Thanks Mohammed for the work you do…” Sep 28, 23:55
- on Marco Speaks Spidey- Challenges of Doom: Spider-Man #1 Review: ““takes us back years for the previously untold first encounter between Peter Parker and Victor von Doom.” Wait, I thought…” Sep 10, 09:24
- on The Top Ten Most Wanted Spider-Man 1967 Figures: “I hope we get more toys from that cartoon.” Sep 8, 19:52
- on Marco Speaks Spidey: What If…? Jessica Jones #1 Review: ““Instead, Jessica’s Spider-Girl career helped make Peter’s career as a reporter.” This is a problem I have with a lot…” Sep 4, 06:03
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #35 (Legacy #999): “Gwen Gone Wild” or “Stroke of Bad Luck”: “@Evan Berry: I am on record as enjoying the Spider-Norman issues much more than the Peter-in-space issues. There was much…” Aug 30, 09:30
Is that the enervator in Spidey’s hand? I may be mixing it up with some other wearable contraption in his history.
How is Doc Ock not plummeting to the ground? Three of his tentacles are hitting the walls but are not attached to anything. Even if that 4th arm is attached to something, there’s no way that it’s holding him upright like he’s pictured here. Shenanigans!