Food for thought.
Web of Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #3
Published: c. March, 1985?
Cover Date: June, 1985
“Iron Bars Do Not a Prison Make…”
Writer: Louise Simonson
Artist: Greg LaRocque
Inker: Jim Mooney
Letterer: Phil Felix
Colorist: George Roussos
You might be interested in …
Panel of the Day #191 (Splash Page Sunday!)
Who’s going to pay for the replacement skylight? Peter Parker, the Spectacular Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #19 Published: c. March, 1978? Cover Date: June, 1978 “Again, the Enforcers!” Writer: Bill Mantlo Artist: Sal Buscema Inker: Mike […]
Panel(s) of the Day #793 (Mary Jane Monday!)
I like how that random dude in the next booth over gets a comment in. Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #44 Published: c. November, 1966? Cover Date: January, 1967 “Where Crawls the Lizard!” Writer: Stan Lee […]
Panel(s) of the Day #1521
A laundry list of worries. Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #45 Published: c. December, 1966? Cover Date: February, 1967 “Spidey Smashes Out!” Writer: Stan Lee Artist: John Romita Inker: John Romita Letterer: Sam Rosen
1 Comment
Leave a Reply
Support the Crawlspace on Patreon
Crawlspace Discord
Recent Comments
on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “@Paul Penna: I wouldn’t say I was liking Cormac before the Ravage reveal but his character was … “ok”. I…” Oct 4, 08:59- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “I’m surprised by how much I enjoyed Cormac Crane/Ravage. The story is well written, his powers are interesting and he…” Oct 3, 16:27
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “@Big John: Yeah, an annual is a good comparison. Annuals used to have one big story and 1-2 backups, and…” Oct 2, 22:20
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “This was a glorified Annual with A-List talent on the back-ups. And you know, if it was “only” an Annual,…” Oct 2, 18:09
- on Marco Speaks Spidey: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 – “Ravaged” Review: “When a creative team runs out of meaningful stories to tell about a character’s future, they inevitably start digging up…” Sep 30, 16:11
- on Spider-Variants of the Week 9/30/26: “Who’s getting all the ASM covers? You’d need to take out a loan. Thanks Mohammed for the work you do…” Sep 28, 23:55
- on Marco Speaks Spidey- Challenges of Doom: Spider-Man #1 Review: ““takes us back years for the previously untold first encounter between Peter Parker and Victor von Doom.” Wait, I thought…” Sep 10, 09:24
- on The Top Ten Most Wanted Spider-Man 1967 Figures: “I hope we get more toys from that cartoon.” Sep 8, 19:52
- on Marco Speaks Spidey: What If…? Jessica Jones #1 Review: ““Instead, Jessica’s Spider-Girl career helped make Peter’s career as a reporter.” This is a problem I have with a lot…” Sep 4, 06:03
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #35 (Legacy #999): “Gwen Gone Wild” or “Stroke of Bad Luck”: “@Evan Berry: I am on record as enjoying the Spider-Norman issues much more than the Peter-in-space issues. There was much…” Aug 30, 09:30
I mean, technically, MJ didn’t “figure it out”. She just happened to be looking out her window and saw Spider-Man come out of Peter’s bedroom.
If X in a murder mystery just happens to overhear Y monologuing about how they are the murderer, then X didn’t *solve* the murder – they just stumbled upon the key information.