Time heals.
Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #123
Published: c. May, 1973?
Cover Date: August, 1973
“…Just a Man Called Cage!”
Writer: Gerry Conway
Artist: Gil Kane
Inker: John Romita and Tony Mortellaro
Letterer: Artie Simek
Colorist: Dave Hunt
You might be interested in …
Panel of the Day #900! (Splash Page Sunday!)
Reunited and it feels so good. Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 2) #50 Published: c. February, 2003? Cover Date: April, 2003 “Doomed Affairs” Writer: J. Michael Straczynski Artist: John Romita Jr. Inker: Scott Hanna Letterer: Richard Starkings […]
Panel of the Day #1690 (Splash Page Sunday!)
Sometimes there’s a bright side. Spectacular Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #162Published: c. January, 1990?Cover Date: March, 1990 “The Demon and the Dead Man”Writer: Gerry ConwayArtist: Sal BuscemaInker: Sal BuscemaLetterer: Rick ParkerColorist: Bob Sharen
Panel(s) of the Day #1706 (Mary Jane Monday!)
Peter is extremely fortunate to have Mary Jane as a partner. Spectacular Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #225 Published: c. April, 1995?Cover Date: June, 1995 “The Return of the Green Goblin”Writer: Tom DeFalcoArtist: Sal BuscemaInker: Bill SienkiewiczLetterer: […]
2 Comments
Leave a Reply
Support the Crawlspace on Patreon
Crawlspace Discord
Recent Comments
on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “@Paul Penna: I wouldn’t say I was liking Cormac before the Ravage reveal but his character was … “ok”. I…” Oct 4, 08:59- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “I’m surprised by how much I enjoyed Cormac Crane/Ravage. The story is well written, his powers are interesting and he…” Oct 3, 16:27
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “@Big John: Yeah, an annual is a good comparison. Annuals used to have one big story and 1-2 backups, and…” Oct 2, 22:20
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “This was a glorified Annual with A-List talent on the back-ups. And you know, if it was “only” an Annual,…” Oct 2, 18:09
- on Marco Speaks Spidey: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 – “Ravaged” Review: “When a creative team runs out of meaningful stories to tell about a character’s future, they inevitably start digging up…” Sep 30, 16:11
- on Spider-Variants of the Week 9/30/26: “Who’s getting all the ASM covers? You’d need to take out a loan. Thanks Mohammed for the work you do…” Sep 28, 23:55
- on Marco Speaks Spidey- Challenges of Doom: Spider-Man #1 Review: ““takes us back years for the previously untold first encounter between Peter Parker and Victor von Doom.” Wait, I thought…” Sep 10, 09:24
- on The Top Ten Most Wanted Spider-Man 1967 Figures: “I hope we get more toys from that cartoon.” Sep 8, 19:52
- on Marco Speaks Spidey: What If…? Jessica Jones #1 Review: ““Instead, Jessica’s Spider-Girl career helped make Peter’s career as a reporter.” This is a problem I have with a lot…” Sep 4, 06:03
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #35 (Legacy #999): “Gwen Gone Wild” or “Stroke of Bad Luck”: “@Evan Berry: I am on record as enjoying the Spider-Norman issues much more than the Peter-in-space issues. There was much…” Aug 30, 09:30
I own this Spidey issue today as part of the Marvel Epic Collection archives. Thanks for highlighting many of these now classic panels. Someday, I hope to own them all as part of Marvel’s paperback reprints.
There wasn’t a time-jump between ASM #122 and #123, right? #123 starts with Norman’s body being taken away, right? So this panel is literally 1 (?) day after Gwen has been killed (unless there’s a time-jump in the middle of #123). I know MJ is trying to help here, but Peter should definitely be in mourning at home and not dragged out to a party.
Also, is the man in the top-left corner supposed to be someone? It’s a big closeup of him so I was wondering if it was someone at Marvel (Stan?).