Ladies Love Peter Parker.
Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #54
Published: c. September, 1967?
Cover Date: November, 1967
“The Tentacles and the Trap!”
Writer: Stan Lee
Artist: John Romita
Inker: Mike Esposito
Letterer: Sam Rosen
You might be interested in …
Panel of the Day #1144 (Splash Page Sunday!)
Appearances can be deceiving. Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #13 Published: c. April, 1964? Cover Date: June, 1964 “The Menace of… Mysterio!” Writer: Stan Lee Artist: Steve Ditko Inker: Steve Ditko Letterer: Artie Simek
Panel(s) of the Day #1722 (Ditko!)
What we have here is a big problem. Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #4 Published: c. July, 1963?Cover Date: September, 1963 “Nothing Can Stop… The Sandman!”Writer: Stan LeeArtist: Steve DitkoInker: Steve DitkoLetterer: Sam Rosen
Panel(s) of the Day #1568
Way to go, Martin! Now that’s what I call being proactive. Peter Parker, the Spectacular Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #60 Published: c. August, 1981? Cover Date: November, 1981 “Beetlemania!” Writer: Roger Stern Artist: Ed Hannigan Inker: […]
4 Comments
Leave a Reply
Support the Crawlspace on Patreon
Crawlspace Discord
Recent Comments
on Spider-Variants of the Week 10/7/26: “This thing may have more variants than ASM #1000.” Oct 6, 18:48- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “My guess, is that Cormac accidentally used his powers on his mother, accidentally erasing her memories when his powers first…” Oct 6, 11:27
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “@Paul Penna: I wouldn’t say I was liking Cormac before the Ravage reveal but his character was … “ok”. I…” Oct 4, 08:59
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “I’m surprised by how much I enjoyed Cormac Crane/Ravage. The story is well written, his powers are interesting and he…” Oct 3, 16:27
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “@Big John: Yeah, an annual is a good comparison. Annuals used to have one big story and 1-2 backups, and…” Oct 2, 22:20
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “This was a glorified Annual with A-List talent on the back-ups. And you know, if it was “only” an Annual,…” Oct 2, 18:09
- on Marco Speaks Spidey: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 – “Ravaged” Review: “When a creative team runs out of meaningful stories to tell about a character’s future, they inevitably start digging up…” Sep 30, 16:11
- on Spider-Variants of the Week 9/30/26: “Who’s getting all the ASM covers? You’d need to take out a loan. Thanks Mohammed for the work you do…” Sep 28, 23:55
- on Marco Speaks Spidey- Challenges of Doom: Spider-Man #1 Review: ““takes us back years for the previously untold first encounter between Peter Parker and Victor von Doom.” Wait, I thought…” Sep 10, 09:24
- on The Top Ten Most Wanted Spider-Man 1967 Figures: “I hope we get more toys from that cartoon.” Sep 8, 19:52
I remember when the capital city of our province announced back in the 1990s that they would be getting a casino. Part of the advertising for it was that it would be pirate-themed and they were not shy in mentioning in their advertisements that the waitress would be dressed as “buxom wenches”. Obviously this casino would have been protested and never built if this happened today.
@hornacek: Yes and yes.
Also, Gwen is referring to herself and MJ as “wenches”?
This new boarder is Doc Ock, right? Peter obviously made the wrong decision here.