Gang wars are exhausting.
Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #288
Published: c. February, 1987?
Cover Date: May, 1987
“Gang War Rages On!”
Writer: Jim Owsley
Artist: Alan Kupperberg
Inker: Jim Fern
Letterer: Rick Parker
Colorist: George Roussos
You might be interested in …
Panel of the Day #1660 (Splash Page Sunday!)
Spidey’s pretty resourceful, so I’m sure he’ll be fine. Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #158 Published: c. April, 1976? Cover Date: July, 1976 “Hammerhead Is Out!” Writer: Len Wein Artist: Ross Andru Inker: Mike Esposito Letterer: […]
Panel of the Day #1357 (Splash Page Sunday!)
What a nightmare! Web of Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #90 Published: c. May, 1992? Cover Date: July, 1992 “Sleight of Mind!” Writer: Howard Mackie Artist: Alex Saviuk Inker: Sam de la Rosa Letterer: Rick Parker Colorist: […]
Panel of the Day #370 (It’s Valentine’s Day Again, Peter Parker!)
What a nice thing to say. Happy Valentine’s Day, friends! I (heart) Marvel: Web of Romance #1 Published: c. February, 2006? Cover Date: April, 2006 “Web of Romance” Writer: Tom Beland Artist: Cory Walker Inker: […]
1 Comment
Leave a Reply
Support the Crawlspace on Patreon
Crawlspace Discord
Recent Comments
on Marco Speaks Spidey: Midnight Spider-Man #1 Review: “Don’t forget Uncle Ben’s ongoing lawsuit against Oscorp for the wrongful death of Peter’s parents, and Oscorp’s potential ulterior motive…” Oct 8, 14:53- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “@Paul Penna: “My guess, is that Cormac accidentally used his powers on his mother, accidentally erasing her memories when his…” Oct 7, 11:04
- on Spider-Variants of the Week 10/7/26: “This thing may have more variants than ASM #1000.” Oct 6, 18:48
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “My guess, is that Cormac accidentally used his powers on his mother, accidentally erasing her memories when his powers first…” Oct 6, 11:27
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “@Paul Penna: I wouldn’t say I was liking Cormac before the Ravage reveal but his character was … “ok”. I…” Oct 4, 08:59
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “I’m surprised by how much I enjoyed Cormac Crane/Ravage. The story is well written, his powers are interesting and he…” Oct 3, 16:27
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “@Big John: Yeah, an annual is a good comparison. Annuals used to have one big story and 1-2 backups, and…” Oct 2, 22:20
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “This was a glorified Annual with A-List talent on the back-ups. And you know, if it was “only” an Annual,…” Oct 2, 18:09
- on Marco Speaks Spidey: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 – “Ravaged” Review: “When a creative team runs out of meaningful stories to tell about a character’s future, they inevitably start digging up…” Sep 30, 16:11
- on Spider-Variants of the Week 9/30/26: “Who’s getting all the ASM covers? You’d need to take out a loan. Thanks Mohammed for the work you do…” Sep 28, 23:55
No idea if it was this issue but I remember a Gang War story the was supposed to be 3 parts and went on for 5. The cover of the 5th issue specifically said “Part 5 of the 3-part story” which I felt was a meta-joke that this story had overstayed its welcome and would just not end.