Harry still can’t catch a break.
Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #51
Published: c. June, 1967?
Cover Date: August, 1967
“In the Clutches of… The Kingpin!”
Writer: Stan Lee
Artist: John Romita
Inker: Mike Esposito
Letterer: Sam Rosen
You might be interested in …
Panel(s) of the Day #544
Death is a hard thing to accept. Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #122 Published: c. April, 1973? Cover Date: July, 1973 “The Goblin’s Last Stand!” Writer: Gerry Conway Artist: Gil Kane Inker: John Romita and Tony […]
Spider-Gwen (Vol. 2) #22 Review
“Threes. Peter. Harry. Gwen. The Lizard. The Goblin…the Spider-Woman. Does death really come in threes?” Gwen and the Harry Lizard continue to mix it up with The Hand, Wolverine, and Shadowcat while a horrible fate […]
Spider-Gwen (Vol. 2) #31 Review
“That stupid bridge. So many awful things have happened in its shadow. So many of us had fallen there. But no one had ever jumped.” The Gwens go to the infamous bridge. What could possibly go […]
2 Comments
Leave a Reply
Support the Crawlspace on Patreon
Crawlspace Discord
Recent Comments
on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “@Paul Penna: I just can’t imagine Cormac/Ravage being left around after this whole thing is resolved, to return periodically to…” Oct 11, 09:35- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “Wow! Poochie came from another planet? “If all he does is use his powers to erase people’s memories to make…” Oct 10, 15:11
- on Marco Speaks Spidey: Midnight Spider-Man #1 Review: “What happened to Aunt May? Is that who Ben was calling?” Oct 10, 00:55
- on Marco Speaks Spidey: Midnight Spider-Man #1 Review: “Don’t forget Uncle Ben’s ongoing lawsuit against Oscorp for the wrongful death of Peter’s parents, and Oscorp’s potential ulterior motive…” Oct 8, 14:53
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “@Paul Penna: “My guess, is that Cormac accidentally used his powers on his mother, accidentally erasing her memories when his…” Oct 7, 11:04
- on Spider-Variants of the Week 10/7/26: “This thing may have more variants than ASM #1000.” Oct 6, 18:48
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “My guess, is that Cormac accidentally used his powers on his mother, accidentally erasing her memories when his powers first…” Oct 6, 11:27
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “@Paul Penna: I wouldn’t say I was liking Cormac before the Ravage reveal but his character was … “ok”. I…” Oct 4, 08:59
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “I’m surprised by how much I enjoyed Cormac Crane/Ravage. The story is well written, his powers are interesting and he…” Oct 3, 16:27
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “@Big John: Yeah, an annual is a good comparison. Annuals used to have one big story and 1-2 backups, and…” Oct 2, 22:20
@Steve – I don’t think an issue of Amazing was overlooked. Did you mean this review?
https://www.spidermancrawlspace.com/2024/08/alford-notes-amazing-spider-man-55-love-is-a-splendid-thing/
Amazing is so terrible and unreadable now there wasn’t even a review up for last months issue