In the words of Mary Jane: “Have a happy!”
Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #46
Published: c. January, 1967?
Cover Date: March, 1967
“The Sinister Shocker!”
Writer: Stan Lee
Artist: John Romita
Inker: John Romita
Letterer: Sam Rosen
You might be interested in …
Panel(s) of the Day #416 (Mary Jane Monday!)
It seems like Peter frequently has at least two different women vying for his attention. Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #288 Published: c. February, 1987? Cover Date: May, 1987 “Gang War Rages On!” Writer: Jim Owsley […]
Panel of the Day #867 (Splash Page Sunday!)
Hey, it’s everyone’s favorite love interest! Marvel Team-Up Annual (Vol. 1) #2 Published: c. 1979? Cover Date: 1979 “Murder in Cathedral Canyon!” Writer: Chris Claremont Artist: Sal Buscema Inker: Jack Abel Letterer: Joe Rosen Colorist: […]
Panel(s) of the Day #1157 (Mary Jane Monday!)
Sometimes people surprise you. Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #265 Published: c. March, 1985? Cover Date: June, 1985 “After the Fox!” Writer: Tom DeFalco Artist: Ron Frenz Inker: Joe Rubinstein Letterer: Phil Felix Colorist: Bob Sharen
4 Comments
Leave a Reply
Support the Crawlspace on Patreon
Crawlspace Discord
Recent Comments
on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “@Paul Penna: I just can’t imagine Cormac/Ravage being left around after this whole thing is resolved, to return periodically to…” Oct 11, 09:35- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “Wow! Poochie came from another planet? “If all he does is use his powers to erase people’s memories to make…” Oct 10, 15:11
- on Marco Speaks Spidey: Midnight Spider-Man #1 Review: “What happened to Aunt May? Is that who Ben was calling?” Oct 10, 00:55
- on Marco Speaks Spidey: Midnight Spider-Man #1 Review: “Don’t forget Uncle Ben’s ongoing lawsuit against Oscorp for the wrongful death of Peter’s parents, and Oscorp’s potential ulterior motive…” Oct 8, 14:53
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “@Paul Penna: “My guess, is that Cormac accidentally used his powers on his mother, accidentally erasing her memories when his…” Oct 7, 11:04
- on Spider-Variants of the Week 10/7/26: “This thing may have more variants than ASM #1000.” Oct 6, 18:48
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “My guess, is that Cormac accidentally used his powers on his mother, accidentally erasing her memories when his powers first…” Oct 6, 11:27
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “@Paul Penna: I wouldn’t say I was liking Cormac before the Ravage reveal but his character was … “ok”. I…” Oct 4, 08:59
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “I’m surprised by how much I enjoyed Cormac Crane/Ravage. The story is well written, his powers are interesting and he…” Oct 3, 16:27
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “@Big John: Yeah, an annual is a good comparison. Annuals used to have one big story and 1-2 backups, and…” Oct 2, 22:20
@Hornacek — Well, that’s a relief — I was starting to feel really glad that I wasn’t around then, just for that alone.
@Evan Berry: This was a man in his 40s trying to write dialogue that he thought teenagers actually said.
That might be the most dialogue-dense series of panels I’ve ever seen. They sure called each other “dad” and “son” a lot in the sixties.
Flash was all about “fake news” back in the 1960s.