J. Scott Campbell has produced a variant for the first issue of Amazing Spider-Man:Renew Your Vows #1. The cover is only available on his website and it’s a beautiful cover, especially for us MJ fans and wedding fans. There are multiple versions of the cover, the cheapest is $24.99 Click here to order it.
You might be interested in …
Spider-Variants of the Week 4/12/23
Will You Be Picking Up A Variant This Week? And don’t forget to check out the previews for this week’s releases as well Miles Morales: Spider-Man #5Carnage #12Marvel’s Voices: Spider-Verse #1Captain Marvel #48 MILES MORALES: […]
Peter David Podcast Interview Coming in 2011
Peter David just signed up on Facebook and I welcomed him. I also asked if he’d be game for another podcast interview and he had the following to say.
Spider-Variants of the Week 9/16/26
What Variant Will You Be Picking Up This Week? Spider-Man: Long Way Home #3 Incentive Queen in Black #4 Incentive Queen in Black: Defenders of Light and Dark #3
6 Comments
Leave a Reply
Support the Crawlspace on Patreon
Crawlspace Discord
Recent Comments
on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “@Paul Penna: I wouldn’t say I was liking Cormac before the Ravage reveal but his character was … “ok”. I…” Oct 4, 08:59- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “I’m surprised by how much I enjoyed Cormac Crane/Ravage. The story is well written, his powers are interesting and he…” Oct 3, 16:27
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “@Big John: Yeah, an annual is a good comparison. Annuals used to have one big story and 1-2 backups, and…” Oct 2, 22:20
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “This was a glorified Annual with A-List talent on the back-ups. And you know, if it was “only” an Annual,…” Oct 2, 18:09
- on Marco Speaks Spidey: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 – “Ravaged” Review: “When a creative team runs out of meaningful stories to tell about a character’s future, they inevitably start digging up…” Sep 30, 16:11
- on Spider-Variants of the Week 9/30/26: “Who’s getting all the ASM covers? You’d need to take out a loan. Thanks Mohammed for the work you do…” Sep 28, 23:55
- on Marco Speaks Spidey- Challenges of Doom: Spider-Man #1 Review: ““takes us back years for the previously untold first encounter between Peter Parker and Victor von Doom.” Wait, I thought…” Sep 10, 09:24
- on The Top Ten Most Wanted Spider-Man 1967 Figures: “I hope we get more toys from that cartoon.” Sep 8, 19:52
- on Marco Speaks Spidey: What If…? Jessica Jones #1 Review: ““Instead, Jessica’s Spider-Girl career helped make Peter’s career as a reporter.” This is a problem I have with a lot…” Sep 4, 06:03
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #35 (Legacy #999): “Gwen Gone Wild” or “Stroke of Bad Luck”: “@Evan Berry: I am on record as enjoying the Spider-Norman issues much more than the Peter-in-space issues. There was much…” Aug 30, 09:30
I considered buying it, and stopped for two reasons:
1) I don’t have the extra money to buy this incredible variant.
2) It’s a Quesada tactic to say “Never mind, Spider-Fans! The marriage exists! Now, please stop filing lawsuits against me and Dan Slott.” As much as I love this, and the marriage in general, I’m still not on for RYV. If you’ll excuse, I’m gonna rant on YouTube about this.
Beautiful cover, but I don’t buy variants either and I’m certainly not wasting that kind of money on Slott’s writing.
It’s an amazing cover. But I don’t have the .
See, I didn’t want to buy the issue until I read reviews to see if slott’s writing was any good. Now I want to buy it solely for that cover!
I don’t buy variants, but good lord Campbell draws a damn fine MJ.
I considered it, until I saw the price tag. Pass.