Amazing Spider-Man 2001 Annual
PLOT: Mary Jane is back and she and Peter attempt to put their lives back together. She is still spooked by things that remind her of her kidnapping and confinement The couple moves back in with Aunt May and during an intimate moment Peter,as Spider-Man, leaves to thwart a terrorist attack. Left alone Mary Jane ponders their life together and makes a decision about their future.
LIKES: Nice concept but not so nice execution. Sadly that’s about the best you can say of most of Mackie’s run. The idea of devoting an entire annual to the after affects of MJ’s deliverance from the kidnapper is a good idea. The two best things about this annual is that it tries to explore the relationship between Peter and Mary Jane and it is the end of Mackie’s time on this book. Oh, and at least we finally found out what was in that darn box.
DISLIKES: Mackie can’t quite pull it off. Whether or not you agree with MJ’s ultimate decision is irrelevant. The rub is how well the story is done and I just don’t buy it. Just before the emergency at the United Nations is brought to Peter’s attention MJ says, “I feel as though I am where I belong, I feel happy…safe.” By book’s end she’s saying she and Peter have changed so much they can’t go back to the way they were before. And Peter agrees saying he’s known the same thing for awhile?! And just how have they changed? Think back to the start of the Mackie/Byrne debacle. Peter was hiding the fact that he had returned to being Spidey from MJ and she was furious when she found out. Shortly thereafter she boarded the plane to a 16 issue absence. Seems they both forgot all about this. And why would Peter going off as Spidey so profoundly effect her that she would change from saying everything was perfect to feeling she had to leave? Did she forget she had to deal with Peter being Spider-Man? There are ample reasons for Mary Jane to feel she needs time by herself for awhile but they’re not presented here. And as for Joe Bennett’s artwork; I’ve enjoyed it in previous issues but he’s better suited to action issues. A little more subtlety is required in some of the faces and at times the bodies seem strangely contorted. Finally a note to editor Axel Alonso: Anna Watson appeared in Peter Parker: Spider-Man 29 so how could she be in Florida since November?
RATING: ![]()
out of 4 web-heads and that’s because I’m feeling generous due to the official end of the Mackie era.
HB 56
View articlesYou might be interested in …
THE AMAZING SPIDER-MAN #639 Review
AMAZING SPIDER-MAN #639 “One Moment in Time, Chapter Two: Something New” Writer: Joe Quesada Penciler: Paolo Rivera and Joe Quesada Inker: Paolo Rivera and Danny Miki Colorist: Paolo Rivera and Richard Isanove “Spidey Sundays” Writer: […]
Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #549 Review
THE AMAZING SPIDER-MAN #549 TITLE: “Who’s That Girl?!?” WRITER: Marc Guggenheim ART: Salvador Larroca COLORIST: Jason Keith PLOT: An unseen, vaguely “goblinesque” assailant decapitates some thugs at a warehouse by the docks. The following morning, […]
Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #511 Review
Amazing Spider-Man #511 (#70) “Sin Past-Part Three” Writers: J. Michael Straczynski Penciler: Mike Deodato Jr. Inker: Joe Pimentel PLOT: A perplexed Spider-Man is still reeling from the information Lt. Lamont provided him on the contents in the back of the one page […]
Crawlspace Discord

Social
Recent Comments
Hornacek on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “@Paul Penna: “My guess, is that Cormac accidentally used his powers on his mother, accidentally erasing her memories when his…” Oct 7, 11:04
Brad Douglas on Spider-Variants of the Week 10/7/26: “This thing may have more variants than ASM #1000.” Oct 6, 18:48
Paul Penna on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “My guess, is that Cormac accidentally used his powers on his mother, accidentally erasing her memories when his powers first…” Oct 6, 11:27
Hornacek on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “@Paul Penna: I wouldn’t say I was liking Cormac before the Ravage reveal but his character was … “ok”. I…” Oct 4, 08:59
Paul Penna on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “I’m surprised by how much I enjoyed Cormac Crane/Ravage. The story is well written, his powers are interesting and he…” Oct 3, 16:27
Hornacek on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “@Big John: Yeah, an annual is a good comparison. Annuals used to have one big story and 1-2 backups, and…” Oct 2, 22:20
Big John on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “This was a glorified Annual with A-List talent on the back-ups. And you know, if it was “only” an Annual,…” Oct 2, 18:09
Steve on Marco Speaks Spidey: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 – “Ravaged” Review: “When a creative team runs out of meaningful stories to tell about a character’s future, they inevitably start digging up…” Sep 30, 16:11
Brad Douglas on Spider-Variants of the Week 9/30/26: “Who’s getting all the ASM covers? You’d need to take out a loan. Thanks Mohammed for the work you do…” Sep 28, 23:55
Hornacek on Marco Speaks Spidey- Challenges of Doom: Spider-Man #1 Review: ““takes us back years for the previously untold first encounter between Peter Parker and Victor von Doom.” Wait, I thought…” Sep 10, 09:24

