Our friend Roger Stern recently gave an interview to Newsarama about his upcoming work in Amazing Spider-Man # 580. He talks about how the character is back to the model he likes and enjoys writing. The article also talks about his opinion on how Peter Parker married the wrong girl, and how it was tough to write him as a married man.
His upcoming issue will deal with a mysterious villain Spider-Man has never faced before and can’t lay a hand on. Amazing Spider-Man #580 goes on sale December 10th, so show your support. Roger is one of my all-time favorite writers and I’d love to see him back on the book.
Stern also gave an interview at the Pulse website. Click here for the link.
Stern is a regular poster on our message board, and if you’d like to talk about his upcoming issue, click on this thread.
Brad Douglas
View articlesBrad created the Crawlspace back in 1998 while attending college at the University of Missouri-Columbia. He’s the webmaster and writes front page news items, and also produces, hosts and edits the podcast. He’s been collecting Spider-Man comics since the age of three and is a life-long fan of the webhead. His website has been featured in USA Today, Entertainment Weekly and on Marvel.com and inside the comics themselves. The Crawlspace is one of the first Spider-Man fan sites to ever hit the internet. Millions of people visit the site every year.
Brad has interviewed several “Spider-Celebrities” over the years including co-creator Stan Lee. He’s also interviewed actors who have portrayed Spider-Man like Paul Soles (Voice Actor from the 67 Spider-Man Cartoon), Dan Gilvezan (Spidey Voice Actor from Spider-Man & His Amazing Friends) ,Yuri Lownthal (Voice Actor from the Spider-Man PlayStation game) and Nicholas Hammond (Spider-Man 1977 Actor).
You might be interested in …
Spider-Gwen in February 2015
Marvel sent me this press release to make it official. MARVEL PROUDLY ANNOUNCES SPIDER-GWEN! New Series Focuses on Gwen Stacy who was Bitten by the Radioactive Spider Instead of Peter Parker New York, NY—October 17th, […]
July 2016 Sales Figures
For The Full List Head Here Sales Figures Provided by Comic Book Resources While it isn’t surprising to see the increase in sales for Amazing Spider-Man #15, considering it’s Mary Jane on the cover donning the […]
Happy 2012 From the Crawlspace
Here’s to 2012 being a bigger and better year for Spider-Fans. I want to thank everyone who’s visited the site over the last 13 years and I’m looking forward to our 14th year online to […]
13 Comments
Leave a Reply
Crawlspace Discord

Social
Recent Comments
Faiz on Read’s Reads Amazing Spider-Man #28/992: “I was sad to read in the letters page about John Romita JR stepping away from ASM. It did seem…” May 12, 11:01
Hornacek on Spider-Tracer: Top Ten Spider-Man Characters Co-Created by Gerry Conway: ““Glory Grant was J. Jonah Jameson’s secretary for years, and even lived in the same apartment as Peter Parker for…” May 12, 06:11
Treyvon Williams on Spider-Variants of the Week 5/13/26: “I love that avengers variant cover homage to avengers: age of ultron 2015 movie poster.” May 11, 20:20
Hornacek on Read’s Reads Amazing Spider-Man FCBD 2026 Review: “When I saw The Answer I thought at first he’d be treated like a joke, when Slott brought back F.A.C.A.D.E.…” May 7, 12:58
Evan Berry on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #27 (Legacy #991): “The Real Torment Was The Ending” or “MJ Lets Torment Go”: “@Hornacek – I definitely remember that story. It was The Last Temptation of Eddie Brock from 2007, part of the…” May 7, 07:27
adam coppola on MARCO SPEAKS SPIDEY- Marvel/DC: Spider-Man/Superman #1 REVIEW: “Just bought this book, the first comic i’ve actually bought in a while, and yes the first story was very…” May 6, 21:12
Hornacek on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #27 (Legacy #991): “The Real Torment Was The Ending” or “MJ Lets Torment Go”: “@Aqu@: I read all of the 90s Venom mini-series and I don’t remember it ever being said there that Eddie…” May 5, 10:22
Aqu@ on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #27 (Legacy #991): “The Real Torment Was The Ending” or “MJ Lets Torment Go”: “Aand that happens when you’re interrupted when writing a comment. It got cut. *history (but it does check out with…” May 5, 07:03
Aqu@ on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #27 (Legacy #991): “The Real Torment Was The Ending” or “MJ Lets Torment Go”: ““No consistency among *today’s different Marvel writers” Mmh, from a quick look at a wiki, it seems Venom only convinced…” May 5, 06:58
Hornacek on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #27 (Legacy #991): “The Real Torment Was The Ending” or “MJ Lets Torment Go”: “@Aqu@: “It’s also unfortunately true that symbiotes’ abilities often change from writer to writer.” Wait a minute, you’re telling me…” May 4, 09:11


RS: Could? Possibly. Should? Not so much. The thing is, Spider-Man is a mystery to his general public — he could be anyone under that mask. No one would know about his marital status — or even give it much thought, unless they were enemies looking to strike at him through loved ones. In those pre-“Brand-New-Day” stories, it wasn’t really Spider-Man who was married, it was Peter Parker.
And Peter for the most part works best as a young, single guy. I would never say he should never marry. But he certainly should not be married to Mary Jane Watson. That’s just crazy.
The only way the writers were able to keep that marriage going on the printed page for as long as they did was by changing who Pete and MJ were, by turning them into different people. And a lot of talented writers worked on Spider-Man during that period, doing their best, but that marriage never quite worked for to me. It was like hearing about two old friends who’d run off and made this terrible mistake.
Enigma: … who… who is this man… and what the h*** is he smoking? And WHY is Spider-Man the ONLY person in the Marvel U that must NOT change, evolve, and grow?!?!?
Oh, I forgot… he exists in his own little bubble… his own little world… where nothing ever changes… everything remains constant… second verse, same as the first… and marrying the high school sweetheart that he fell in love with… that’s a no-no…. because he shold be a swinging single, who’ll never get lucky… the old “Parker luck” will see to that… now that I think about it, if they won’t let him stay married to Mary Jane, why the hell do they even bother keeping her around in the first place? And will there ever be a point where he “passes the torch” so to speak, or is that wishful thinking on my part?
Well, Spider-Girl was cancelled, so I guess that answers my question…
… and someone should tell CP that other than a few diamonds in the rough, current Spidey stories haven’t been hitting on s*** either. But I’m a supposed MJ fascist… so what do I know, right? If I had any real sense, I’d be a member of the BND Illuminati or something…
RS:
“As a matter of fact, Marvel’s been trying to correct that particular mistake for years. I believe that the original thought behind what turned into the Clone Saga was to re-establish an unmarried Spider-Man…in a way that didn’t involve divorce or death.”
And look how well that lasted. i expect BND to go the same way.
Thanks again, RS, feels good to hear someone finally say things like this! (ok, I’m leaving now, just wanted the new folks to know that there are Spidey fans other than MJ fascists on this board.)
RS:
“As a matter of fact, Marvel’s been trying to correct that particular mistake for years. I believe that the original thought behind what turned into the Clone Saga was to re-establish an unmarried Spider-Man…in a way that didn’t involve divorce or death.”
So true, Mr Stern! I kinda felt this way the six years before BND.
RS:
“…with prose you can have your characters engage in long, meaty discussions or even monologues that would be a series of boring-looking talking head shots in a comic book. ”
Oh, yeah, and StyleShift, the last 20 years of Spidey purchases happened because of Spidey, NOT because PP was married to MJ. The last 20 years is replete with horrible story lines, too btw.
You Go, Mr Stern!!!
RS:
“The only way the writers were able to keep that marriage going on the printed page for as long as they did was by changing who Pete and MJ were, by turning them into different people. And a lot of talented writers worked on Spider-Man during that period, doing their best, but that marriage never quite worked for to me. It was like hearing about two old friends who’d run off and made this terrible mistake.”
Love Stern but I have to admit he’s wrong about the marriage.
20 years of comics means it was successful. That’s nearly half of the time Spidey’s been around.
Anyone else notice that the only time we had bad stories was when Marvel was trying to eliminate it?
Of course, someone named Miles Warren couldn’t see why Gwen would be the girlfriend from hell! 😉 She was frosty to Peter and first and then when they started dating got very clingy with dramatic mood swings. That, or Stan Lee just over dramatized everything!
“Girlfriend from Hell”? Gwen?
C’mon. LOL I’m interested to know what Roger’s reasoning is behind these kind of comments.
Actually, I wondered the same thing, Webhead623 on another message board and Roger Stern himself responded and stated, “Just for the record, I never thought that Gwen was Pete’s “true love,” either. She was often the girl-friend-from-Hell.” So, in light of that, I re-read his comments, and basically Stern is saying that the Spider-Man, because he works better when he’s single, hasn’t found the right woman yet. And it’s not only limited to MJ, but presumably every woman he’s ever dated, including Gwen, Betty, Felicia, etc. And probably never will find the right girl as long as there’s a Spider-Man comic being published.
Yeah, that should read Gwen is the RIGHT girl. Sorry.
I wonder if he thinks Gwen is the wrong girl. I’m sorry, but I read Parallel Lives as a young teen and I TOTALLY feel she is the right girl. Agree to disagree.
Like him as a writer but he clearly wrong here with his views and not even he will bring me back to reading the book again.
I don’t get what he means about “marrying the wrong girl”. Who should he have married?