Get More: Movie Trailers, Movies Blog
You might be interested in …
Spider-Previews 06/02/21
Marvel sent over these previews for books being released on June 2nd, 2021. What will you be picking up? Comment below.
Possible Spider-Man 4 Poster?
This isn’t the most reliable source, but blogger Perez Hilton has posted this image for Spider-Man 4. Is it photo shop or a release from Sony? You be the judge.
Spider-Variants of the Week 1/29/25
What Variant Will You Be Picking Up This Week? CRAWLSPACE PREVIEWS (Coming Soon)
6 Comments
Leave a Reply
Support the Crawlspace on Patreon
Crawlspace Discord
Recent Comments
on Spider-Variants of the Week 10/7/26: “This thing may have more variants than ASM #1000.” Oct 6, 18:48- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “My guess, is that Cormac accidentally used his powers on his mother, accidentally erasing her memories when his powers first…” Oct 6, 11:27
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “@Paul Penna: I wouldn’t say I was liking Cormac before the Ravage reveal but his character was … “ok”. I…” Oct 4, 08:59
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “I’m surprised by how much I enjoyed Cormac Crane/Ravage. The story is well written, his powers are interesting and he…” Oct 3, 16:27
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “@Big John: Yeah, an annual is a good comparison. Annuals used to have one big story and 1-2 backups, and…” Oct 2, 22:20
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 (Non-Legacy #36): “Ravaged” or “Well, At Least We Have These Backups”: “This was a glorified Annual with A-List talent on the back-ups. And you know, if it was “only” an Annual,…” Oct 2, 18:09
- on Marco Speaks Spidey: Amazing Spider-Man #1000 – “Ravaged” Review: “When a creative team runs out of meaningful stories to tell about a character’s future, they inevitably start digging up…” Sep 30, 16:11
- on Spider-Variants of the Week 9/30/26: “Who’s getting all the ASM covers? You’d need to take out a loan. Thanks Mohammed for the work you do…” Sep 28, 23:55
- on Marco Speaks Spidey- Challenges of Doom: Spider-Man #1 Review: ““takes us back years for the previously untold first encounter between Peter Parker and Victor von Doom.” Wait, I thought…” Sep 10, 09:24
- on The Top Ten Most Wanted Spider-Man 1967 Figures: “I hope we get more toys from that cartoon.” Sep 8, 19:52
If anything, I was suspecting they would take a cue from the Ultimate story and make Pete’s parents connected to Brock’s. From what I’ve seen of Ultimate and Amazing, I preferred Ultimate’s interpretation of Venom more, so maybe they’re hinting at a better done Venom for a sequel… maybe?
**SIGH** Am I the only one getting tired of how, post-1996, EVERYTHING somehow has ties to Norman Osborn? It’s beyond irritating at this point.
I think most fans can agree that the less said about Peter’s parents being SHIELD agents, probably the better. Although I’d rather we didn’t have a story about Pete’s parents at all, should just be that they dies in a plane crash. End of story. Not every event in Peter’s life has to be tied to superheroes/villains.
Maybe it won’t be revealed until one of the sequels. If we do get one. And as LudaChris said it will be more likely a CIA.
What? How dare they make such a good move and not insert a useless plot for the movie, I’m boycotting
I’m actually more than ok with that. The whole ‘secret agent’ thing has always been almost to ridiculous for me to swallow. They were never gonna be SHIELD agents either just because of the whole copyright thing, although that would be interesting. Personally I’m a big fan of them working at Oscorp, I think that’s a nice touch and I like the way it seemingly ties everything together.