These crazy kids need to stop for a minute and take a deep breath.
Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #37
Published: c. April, 1966?
Cover Date: June, 1966
“Once Upon a Time, There Was a Robot…!”
Plot: Steve Ditko
Script: Stan Lee
Artist: Steve Ditko
Inker: Steve Ditko
Letterer: Artie Simek
I appreciate how detailed that footnote is. Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #168 Published: c. February, 1977? Cover Date: May, 1977 “Murder on the Wind!” Writer: Len Wein Artist: Ross Andru Inker: Mike Esposito Letterer: Joe […]
That explanation will have to wait until another time. Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #257 Published: c. July, 1984? Cover Date: October, 1984 “Beware the Claws of Puma!” Writer: Tom DeFalco Artist: Ron Frenz Inker: Joe […]
Not even giant radioactive reptiles are safe from the wrath of J. Jonah Jameson! Godzilla (Vol. 1) #23 Published: c. March, 1979?Cover Date: June, 1979? “The King Once More”Writer: Doug MoenchArtist: Herb TrimpeInker: Dan GreenLetterer: Irving WatanabeColorist: Ben […]
Comments are closed.
on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1003: “We Interrupt Your Spider-Man Story To Bring You Events From Another Comic” or “Raelith the Wretched’s Day Out”: “@Evan Berry: I’m pretty sure that the reader had Kintsugi’s identity revealed to us before Spidey found it out -…” Nov 13, 21:43
on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1003: “We Interrupt Your Spider-Man Story To Bring You Events From Another Comic” or “Raelith the Wretched’s Day Out”: “@Hornacek — You’re correct about when Spider-man discovered Kintsugi’s identity! I had forgotten about that. I believe, though, that his…” Nov 13, 12:24 on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1003: “We Interrupt Your Spider-Man Story To Bring You Events From Another Comic” or “Raelith the Wretched’s Day Out”: “@Evan Berry: I wrote the bulk of the review on Wed (a holiday) while I waited for Thursday to go…” Nov 13, 09:40 on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #1003: “We Interrupt Your Spider-Man Story To Bring You Events From Another Comic” or “Raelith the Wretched’s Day Out”: “@Hornacek — I just wanted to express my condolences about Puddin’. When I saw the opening image, I thought, “Oh…” Nov 13, 08:23
on Spider-Tracer: 10 Good and 10 Bad Spider-Man Retcons: “I agree with most of them. I do agree that the clone coming back wasn’t a bad story idea (and…” Nov 10, 07:47 on Spider-Tracer: 10 Good and 10 Bad Spider-Man Retcons: “How could this list leave out the biggest Spidey retcon of them all … “MJ knew Peter was Spider-Man from…” Nov 10, 06:42
on Marco Speaks Spidey: Avengers #1 Review: “You should check it out, it was cool read.” Nov 7, 17:03
on Marco Speaks Spidey: Avengers #1 Review: “A part of me wants to go out and buy this issue, even though i haven’t bought a current comic…” Nov 4, 15:26 on Panel of the Day #1750! (Splash Page Sunday!): “I wonder if Green Goblin, Hobgoblin, and Carrion buy their bags at the same store.” Oct 26, 07:39
I figure Ditko for your basic curmudgeon. I wonder if the Objectivism caused that, or amplified it.
This is twice in as many days as I’ve mentioned this podcast, but on the ASM Classics episode covering ASM #39 they spend a lot of time talking about how everybody gets a lot nicer now that Ditko is off the book. It’s really jarring going from #38 to #39 where Flash, Harry, Gwen, and especially Peter were rude, but post-Ditko they’re all either apologizing or thinking “Hey, X is acting differently now, maybe I was wrong about them.”
Ditko’s version of Peter Parker was a real smart-mouth. A mixture of editorial admiration, self-pity, and the needless needling of other people. I think this version of Peter pretty much evaporated as soon as Ditko left the series. However, it makes me see again how totally out-of-whack-with-history Slott’s weak, bungling version of Peter was.
This better be the last page of the current Gwen Stacey series.