Harry looks so pissed.
Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #97
Published: c. March, 1971?
Cover Date: June, 1971
“In the Grip of the Goblin!”
Writer: Stan Lee
Artist: Gil Kane
Inker: Frank Giacoia
Letterer: Sam Rosen
You might be interested in …
Panel of the Day #447
Have you seen what he’s wearing? It’s possible. Spidey Super Stories (Vol. 1) #2 Published: c. August, 1974? Cover Date: November, 1974 “In the Hands of the Hunter!” Writer: Jean Thomas Artist: Winslow Mortimer Inker: […]
Panel(s) of the Day #951
It’s time once again for ghosts and ghouls of all sorts. Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #158 Published: c. April, 1976? Cover Date: July, 1976 “Hammerhead Is Out!” Writer: Len Wein Artist: Ross Andru Inker: Mike […]
Panel(s) of the Day #1389 (Ditko!)
I dunno, I have a feeling someone’s going to slip up. Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #19 Published: c. October, 1964? Cover Date: December, 1964 “Spidey Strikes Back!” Writer: Stan Lee Artist: Steve Ditko Inker: Steve […]
2 Comments
Leave a Reply
Support the Crawlspace on Patreon
Crawlspace Discord
Recent Comments
on Panel of the Day #1549 (Splash Page Sunday!): ““Fitzgerald Grapes” That has to be a reference to someone, right?” May 5, 14:46- on Panel(s) of the Day #1548: “And tomorrow it’ll be the 17th anniversary of the release of Spider-man 3.” May 3, 10:47
- on The Chi✶Town Breakdown: USM #4 (2024): “I loved the issue – one thing that stuck out to me was how oily MJs hair looked in the…” May 2, 15:42
- on The Chi✶Town Breakdown: USM #4 (2024): “@Evan – I went back and saw the “stain”. To me it just looks like a shadow or smudge -…” May 1, 15:58
- on The Chi✶Town Breakdown: USM #4 (2024): “@Chi-Town — It’s probably just a design choice, and I’m thinking too hard. 😀” May 1, 15:55
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #48 (Legacy #942): “The Doctor Will See You Now” or “The (Henry) Winkler Device Returns”: “*checks in* Yep, ASM still sucks…I’m glad Hornacek is covering reviews, otherwise we have to listen to Mark wine.” May 1, 15:04
- on The Chi✶Town Breakdown: USM #4 (2024): “Hornacek: Who do you think TAUGHT that to Mark? That’s why he calls me his “best friend”. Evan: Honestly, never…” May 1, 15:00
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #46 (Legacy #940): “The Ravencroft Redemption” or “Anna Watson, Villain Rehabilitator”: “@Evan Berry: A two-parter makes more sense – a 1980s sitcom would not likely have a subplot going on for…” May 1, 13:49
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #48 (Legacy #942): “The Doctor Will See You Now” or “The (Henry) Winkler Device Returns”: “@Aqu@: “IMO, the ‘behind the scene’ bit was in bad taste; it’s also unnecessary, since actions tell more than words.…” May 1, 13:42
- on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #48 (Legacy #942): “The Doctor Will See You Now” or “The (Henry) Winkler Device Returns”: “IMO, the “behind the scene” bit was in bad taste; it’s also unnecessary, since actions tell more than words. It…” May 1, 11:55
Recent Amazing Spider-Man Reviews
Spider-Satellite Reviews
Subscribe to the Spider-Man Crawlspace Podcast
Apple Podcasts
Google Podcasts
Spotify
Pandora
Amazon Music
iHeartRadio
Podbean
Amazon Alexa
Player.fm
Listen Notes
Stitcher
@hornacek: It’s Harry’s drug dealer.
Who is the guy in the second panel to the right of Peter? He is too well-defined to just be a throwaway character.